![]() |
![]() |
|||
|
© Newswise. |
Women Are More Susceptible to Orthostatic Hypotension than Men
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE NEW STUDY PROVIDES PHYSIOLOGICAL BASIS THAT WOMEN ARE MORE SUSCEPTIBLE TO ORTHOSTATIC HYPOTENSION THAN MEN Study results published in current edition of American Journal of Physiology: Heart and Circulatory Physiology November 27, 2001 -- Bethesda, MD-- The American Journal of Physiology: Heart and Circulatory Physiology, one of the 14 peer-reviewed journals published by the American Physiological Society (APS), spotlights recent research findings designed to improve and understand human well and health. The November edition includes a study focusing on the association of gender, erect posture, and subnormal arterial blood pressure. Introduction Whereas most reports indicate that susceptibility for orthostatic intolerance is more common in women than in men, the mechanisms of this gender difference are unclear. The upright posture causes reductions in venous return leading to diminished stroke volume (SV) and cardiac output (Qi). To maintain blood pressure, the reduction in SV must be compensated for by reflex mechanisms that increase total peripheral resistance (TPR). Otherwise, blood pressure falls, leading to cerebral hypoperfusion and syncope. Reports over several decades support the hypothesis that adequate sympathetic constrictor responses during the assumption of upright posture are critical for the maintenance of arterial pressure and cerebral perfusion. Whether orthostatic sympathetic vascular control is different between genders has not been investigated directly. Gender differences in reflex-mediated sympathetic activation have only recently attracted investigative attention. However, such studies have focused on neural responses to nonbaroreflex stimuli. The results of these earlier studies are equivocal in terms of whether or not gender differences exist in sympathetic reactivity. Reports of lower plasma norepinephrine concentrations in women during orthostatic stress suggest that sympathetic outflow may also be diminished. However, plasma norepinephrine concentrations are not a precise indicator of sympathetic outflow, and more direct measures are required to determine gender differences in sympathetic control during postural stress. Thus the purpose of the current study was to test the hypothesis that sympathetic adjustments to tilt are attenuated in women versus men, leading to diminished blood pressure responses to head-up tilt (HUT). In addition, measures of Qi and blood pressure were gathered to examine systemic neurovascular control. The results of the study, "Gender Affects Sympathetic and Hemodynamic Response to Postural Stress," conducted by J. Kevin Shoemaker and Derek S. Kimmerly, at the Neurovascular Research Laboratory, School of Kinesiology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada; Mazhar Khan and Cynthia S. Hogeman, at the Division of Cardiology, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, The Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA; and Lawrence I. Sinoway, at the Lebanon Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Lebanon, PA, provide a physiological basis for the common finding that women are more susceptible to orthostatic hypotension than men. The Study After establishment of baseline measures, data were collected during a five minute period of supine rest, followed by a progressive HUT procedure that included five minutes at each of 20, 40, and 60 degrees of tilt. The subjects were then returned to the supine position. After ~10 min of quiet rest, a second baseline period was obtained, followed by insertion of a hand into ice water (~4 degrees C) for two minutes. During HUT, the increase in sympathetic outflow is due primarily to baroreceptor unloading, whereas the cold pressor test (CPT) elicits a nonspecific response. With the use of these two tests, the researchers examined whether gender differences in sympathetic reflex responses to HUT were present, and whether these were reflex specific. Measurements Data Analysis Results: Head-Up Tilt A gender-tilt interaction was also present for the effect of tilt on PP (i.e., P < 0.002). Specifically, at 60 degree HUT the PP was 12 +- 3.8 and 2.06 +- 3.34 mmHg for women and men, respectively (P < 0.001). SV and Qi decreased similarly in both groups during HUT. At the highest tilt angle, SVi decreased 36 +- 7 ml/m2 in the males and 47 +- 4 ml/m2 in the females (P = 0.11). The reduction in Qi at 60 degree HUT was 1.6 +- 0.5 l/min in the males and 2.0 +- 0.2 l/min in the females (P = 0.31). TPR increased similarly in both groups. MSNA. Baseline MSNA burst frequency was 6.8 +- 1.6 beats/min in females and 16 +- 2 beats/min in males (P < 0.07). Baseline burst frequency normalized to heart rate (burst incidence) was higher in the males (26 +- 4 beats/100 heartbeats) than the females (11 +- 2 beats/100 heartbeats; P < 0.05). The baseline differences led to a main effect of group (P < 0.03) with males demonstrating a consistently higher burst frequency during HUT. Results: Cold Pressor Test MSNA. Compared with baseline, MSNA burst frequency and burst incidence increased during the CPT (P < 0.05) in both men and women. Unlike the HUT test, mean burst amplitude increased in both females (from 25 +- 4 to 33 +- 6 units; P < 0.02) and males (from 40 +- 4 to 58 +- 10 units; P < 0.002) between baseline and CPT. However, when compared with the females, the total MSNA response to the CPT was greater (P < 0.05) in the males due to a similar frequency but greater Mean burst amplitude (P < 0.05). Thus the different response to a CPT in females versus males is qualitatively similar to that for HUT. Discussion and Conclusions These data support the hypothesis that baroreflex sensitivity for control of sympathetic outflow is diminished in women. The details regarding the effect of gender on baroreflex sympathetic control remain unclear. Furthermore, it is not known how regional vascular responses to sympathetic excitation vary between males and females. As such, these data suggest that blood pressure control during HUT differs in healthy men and women. Source: American Journal of Physiology: Heart and Circulatory Physiology, November 2001 -end- The American Physiological Society (APS) was founded in 1887 to foster basic and applied science, much of it relating to human health.The Bethesda, MD-based Society has more than 10,000 members and publishes 3,800 articles in its 14 peer-reviewed journals every year. ***
|
|||||||||||||||||||||