The 2012 presidential debates between Barack Obama and Mitt Romney begin Wednesday, Oct. 3, with a debate on domestic policy at the University of Denver. Additional debates will be Oct. 16 and 22. For a complete and ongoing look at expert sources, election-related news releases and IU media resources, visit IU's Decision 2012 media guide for complete election resources at IU. Indiana University faculty members are available to comment. They offer these most recent observations:
Managing expectations, courting independents
Caitlin Dwyer and Kristina Sheeler, faculty members in the IU School of Liberal Arts at Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, note that the Romney and Obama campaigns are both playing down expectations for the debates. Their goal in the debates isn't so much to "win" the debates but to do better than anticipated and appear presidential.
Obama's campaign insists he hasn't had time to prepare because he's busy being president, said Dwyer, an assistant professor in the Department of Political Science. Romney's campaign has called Obama a "gifted speaker," and Romney has declined to predict victory in the debates.
"Normally we see the campaigns bashing each other," Dwyer said. "But when it comes to the debates, we see a complete flip, and each candidate is saying the other is a much better debater."
"Managing expectations is not new, but it is an important pre-debate strategy," said Sheeler, chair and associate professor in the Department of Communication Studies. "If the Romney campaign can lower expectations, then even a marginal performance will be perceived as a major debate victory."
Sheeler says the debates are Romney's "last chance to convince the voters that he is the preferable candidate and able to connect with middle-class voters," with just five weeks remaining until Election Day and major polls showing the race even or Obama ahead. "This may be easier said than done given that the incumbent president is widely thought of as a gifted orator," she said.
Dwyer notes that independent voters in a handful of battleground states will be the target audience for both candidates. TV networks will gauge the reaction of Republican, Democratic and independent voters to the debates in real time, and "people should be watching that independent line move up and down to see how they react to the candidates' statements," she said. Furthermore, the Oct. 16 debate will feature a town-hall format in which questions are asked by undecided voters selected by the Gallup organization.
"I think that debate will be particularly interesting and will shed some light on how independent voters view the candidates and issues and how the candidates frame their responses to appeal to those voters who still have to make up their minds before November," Dwyer said.
Advice for the candidates
The debates may offer a unique and enticing platform for voters who are overwhelmed by campaign ads or pundit-driven inflammatory discourse, says Brian DeLong, lecturer in the School of Public and Environmental Affairs and the IU Bloomington debate coach. As such, he offers the following advice to the candidates:
-- Stay on message -- "At least for the first debate, if Romney can hit his stump speech remarks on the economy, health care and governance, he will walk away a winner," DeLong said. By staying on message, the debates will function as confirmation that Romney has a presidential ethos that indicates he can clearly handle pressure. But he shouldn't just rehash old speeches. DeLong suggests introducing a vetted "wild-card" issue that can spark post-debate discussion.
-- Balance targeted and broad-appeal messages -- Romney will need maximum turnout in November, so he will need to reinvigorate enthusiasm among the base. He can also help his ground game by targeting key voters with responses that poll well with these groups. But balance is necessary. "With the circulation of the 47 percent video, Romney will need to have broad appeals to all Americans to undermine criticism that he represents a minority."
-- Likability -- Romney needs to lock into and embody compassion for those who are hurting, the anger of those who are frustrated and the hope people have for a future under his leadership. "If observers can walk away saying that he was authentic in his responses, that he truly cares, the campaign will benefit greatly," DeLong said. "If Romney is overly irritated or displays forced and misplaced emotion, it may confirm his current standing in the polls."
-- Prepare for weaknesses -- Obama must convince undecided voters that the economic situation is better as a result of his efforts, that he knows a path forward and that the administration has their best economic interest in mind. And he must avoid sounding professorial and condescending. "Especially in debates, details of policy do not always matter," DeLong said. "I expect Obama will deploy one or two new narratives of economic success stories."
-- Play to tie -- Obama should avoid attempts to "dominate" or "defeat" Romney. The worst-case scenario would be a self-inflicted wound, such as a clear factual inaccuracy that will take over the news cycle. Since the Oct. 3 debate will focus on the economy, Obama must have specific data points about core economic issues prepared.
-- Voter turnout -- Obama won the 2008 election with a massive grassroots campaign, but enthusiasm from minority and youthful voters may be lower this year. "Obama could be well served by reinvigorating the 'incomplete' project of certain core liberal rights issues to force Romney to take a position," DeLong said. "Discussing abortion, immigration and student debt, if done with tact, could be a low-risk strategy that could keep commitment levels high."
Debates an opportunity for Romney
Debates do matter, says Marjorie Hershey, professor of political science at IU Bloomington. Along with political conventions, they are among the few campaign events that grab the attention of most voters. And among the relatively small proportion of undecided voters -- who will control the outcome of the election -- many are undecided only because they haven't yet given the contest a lot of thought.
"While we tend to look at the debates as theater, they are among the few occasions that many people pay attention to the presidential campaign," Hershey said.
She added that the debates could revive Romney's prospects after a rough few weeks for his campaign, including videotaped remarks at a private fund-raiser, accusations that he tried to politicize the killing of the U.S. ambassador to Libya and criticism by some Republican strategists.
"It won't be hard for Gov. Romney to do better than expected," Hershey said.
Simple goals for each candidate
The debates mark the first time the American public will view Obama and Romney side by side and try to make a determination as to which is best suited to lead the U.S. going forward, says Marie Eisenstein, associate professor of political science at IU Northwest.
"I think that for each candidate, there is one simple goal," she said. "President Obama needs to show that Gov. Romney is not qualified or prepared to be president. That is, Obama needs to demonstrate that Romney lacks the ability to be presidential or to make tough decisions as president. Conversely, Gov. Romney needs to hit Obama hard on his failed economic and foreign policies, which is not critically evaluated in the mainstream media."
Eisenstein said Romney needs to highlight "why voters should -- at a minimum -- vote against Obama," but he can help his cause by also persuasively arguing how he would manage our current economic and foreign policy crises.
Debates usually have little impact
The most important thing to keep in mind about the upcoming presidential and vice presidential debates is that they are not really debates, says Leslie Lenkowsky, clinical professor in the IU School of Public and Environmental Affairs. These quadrennial events are more like carefully staged -- and rehearsed -- press conferences. The amount of new information the debates provide voters is usually small.
"That may be why, in the five decades in which they have been held, hardly any of the debates has had much impact on the outcome of our national elections," Lenkowsky said. "The first one, featuring John F. Kennedy and Richard M. Nixon, was thought at the time to have shifted momentum toward the Massachusetts senator, partly because his Republican opponent looked tired and drained under the glare of the television lights. But studies have subsequently cast doubt on that.
"Since then, memorable moments have been scarce and ones that changed the course of an election virtually unknown. According to most observers, Ronald Reagan is the only candidate who turned potential defeat into victory as a result of a strong debate performance just one week before the election. But of course, Reagan had far more experience in front of a camera than the typical office-seeker."
For the Romney-Ryan ticket, this history is not good news, Lenkowsky added. With polls showing the Republicans trailing, both nationally and in key battleground states, the likelihood that they will be able to use the debates to overcome the gap is small.
"They will probably try to respond to the questions that have arisen about how a Romney administration might govern, hoping to remain competitive and set the stage for a frenetic last two weeks of campaigning," he said. "However, the debate format is not conducive to detailing policy positions.
"For the Obama administration, the goal will be to avoid making a potentially disastrous blunder. Despite high levels of public disapproval and concern about the country's future, President Obama and Vice President Biden have managed to get themselves in position to be re-elected, but their margin for error is not large. As they have been doing all year, they will try to follow the old adage that the best defense is a good offense and go after their Republican opponents. But the questioners may not allow them to do so and force them to defend their record of the past four years."
Lenkowsky's main research focus is on nonprofits and public policy, civil society in comparative perspective, volunteering and civic engagement, and social entrepreneurship. He developed and teaches a course on communications in public affairs.
Social media used by candidates, supporters, available through Truthy
The Truthy team from Indiana University Bloomington has unveiled a timely interactive visualization tool focused on Twitter activity related specifically to the upcoming presidential election. Designed to benefit not only researchers, but also journalists and voters, the election coverage section at Truthy allows visitors to view tweet content and volume from sites connected directly to both presidential candidates and then links activity -- including charted highs and lows -- simultaneously to relevant political and news events.
The site also monitors Twitter activity related directly to political topics, places it in a similar timeline that allows visitors to identify the most influential users talking about those topics, be they left-leaners, right-wingers or of an unknown political bent, and then links guests to those influential Twitter feeds.
The site -- developed by researchers and doctoral students at the School of Informatics and Computing's Center for Complex Networks and Systems Research -- also employs tools like #tagdef, which provides definitions for trending twitter tags, and Klatsch, the open-source framework for analyzing the networks for and users of social media feeds, allowing visitors to view the number of tweets by a candidate-related tag, who the top retweeters are and which users tweet the most.
To speak with members of the Truthy "Elections" research team, contact Steve Chaplin, IU Communications, at 812-856-1896 or email@example.com.