Research Team Publishes Paper That Differentiates Facial Growth in Neanderthals and Modern Humans
Dr. Lacruz and team advance understanding of the morphological processes that distinguish Neanderthals’ faces from modern humans’
Article ID: 644369
Released: 7-Dec-2015 9:05 AM EST
Source Newsroom: New York University
Newswise — Lacruz’s research team showed that the Neanderthals, who appeared about 200,000 years ago, are quite distinct from Homo sapiens (humans) in the manner in which their faces grow, adding to an old but important debate concerning the separation of these two groups. The paper, “Ontogeny of the Maxilla in Neanderthals and their Ancestors,” appears in Nature Communications
“This is an important piece of the puzzle of evolution,” says Lacruz, a paleoanthropologist and enamel biologist. “Some have thought that Neanderthals and humans should not be considered distinct branches of the human family tree. However, our findings, based upon facial growth patterns, indicate they are indeed sufficiently distinct from one another.
In conducting the research, the team set out to understand the morphological processes that distinguish Neanderthals’ faces from modern humans’—a potentially important factor in understanding the process of evolution from archaic to modern humans.
Bone is formed through a process of bone deposition by osteoblasts (bone-forming cells) and resorption by osteoclast (bone-absorbing) cells, which break down bone. In humans, the outermost layer of bone in the face consists of large resorptive fields, but in Neanderthals, the opposite is true: In the outermost layer of bone, there is extensive bone deposition.
The team used an electron microscope and a portable confocal microscope, developed by co-author Dr. Timothy Bromage of NYUCD’s Department of Biomaterials, himself a pioneer in the study of facial growth remodeling in fossil hominins, to map for the first time the bone-cell growth processes (resorption and deposition) that had taken place in the outer layer of the facial skeletons of young Neanderthals.
“Cellular processes relating to growth are preserved on the bones,” says Bromage. “Resorption can be seen as crater-like structures—called lacunae—on the bone surface, whereas layers of osteoblast deposits have a relatively smooth appearance.”
The study found that in Neanderthals, facial bone-growth remodeling—the process by which bone is deposited and reabsorbed, forming and shaping the adult skeleton—contributed to the development of a projecting (prognathic) maxilla (upper jawbone) because of extensive deposits by osteoblasts without a compensatory resorption—a process they shared with ancient hominins. This process is in stark contrast to that in human children, whose faces grow with a counter-balance action mediated by resorption taking place especially in the lower part of the face, leading to a flatter jaw relative to Neanderthals.
The team studied several well-preserved Neanderthal child skulls unearthed in 1926 in the British territory of Gibraltar and from the La Quina site in southwestern France, also excavated in the early 1900s. They also compared Neanderthal facial-growth remodeling with that of four Middle Pleistocene (about 400,000 years ago) hominin faces of teenagers from the fossil collection of the Sima de los Huesos in north-central Spain. The Sima fossils are considered likely Neanderthal ancestors based on both anatomical features and genomic DNA analysis.
“We always considered Neanderthals to be a very different category of hominin,” said Lacruz. “But in fact they share with older African hominins a similar facial growth pattern. It’s actually humans who are developmentally derived, meaning that humans deviated from the ancestral pattern. In that sense, the face that is unique is the modern human face, and the next phase of research is to identify how and when modern humans acquired their facial-growth development plan.”
Moreover, Lacruz says, understanding the process of facial ontogeny can help explain the variation in facial size and shape among modern humans.
In addition to Drs. Lacruz and Bromage, coauthors included: Dr. Paul O’Higgins, Centre for Anatomical and Human Sciences, Department of Archaeology and Hull York Medical School, University of York, United Kingdom; Dr. Juan Luis Arsuaga, Universidad Complutense de Madrid-Instituto Carlos III (UCM-ISCHI), Centre de Investigacion de la Evolucion y Comportamiento Humanos, Madrid, Spain; Dr. Chris Stringer, Department of Earth Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom; Dr. Ricardo Godinho, Centre for Anatomical and Human Sciences, Department of Archaeology and Hull York Medical School, University of York, United Kingdom; Dr. Johanna Warshaw, Department of Basic Science and Craniofacial Biology, NYU College of Dentistry, United States; Dr. Ignacio Martinez, Department de Ciencia de la Vida, Universidad de Alcala (Alcala de Henares), Spain; Dr. Ana Gracia-Tellez, Department Geologia, Geografia y Medio Ambient, Fac. De Biologia, Ciencias Ambientales y Quimica, Universidad de Alcala, Madrid Spain; Dr. Jose Maria Bermudez de Castro, Centro Nacional de Investigacion sobre la Evolucion Humana, Burgos, Spain; and Dr. Eudald Carbonell, Institut Catala de Paleoecologia Humano i Evolucio Social, Tarragona, Spain.
AcknowledgementsProject funded by NIH/NIDCR (DE022799) to RSL and Leakey Foundation to RSL. Research support was also provided by the 2010 Max Planck Research Award to TGB, endowed by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research to the Max Planck Society and the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation in respect of the Hard Tissue Research Program in Human Paleobiomics.. CS’s research is supported by the Calleva Foundation and the Human Origins Research Fund. This article has been also sponsored by the Dirección General de Investigación of the Spanish Ministry of “Economía y Competitividad”, Grant numbers CGL2012-38434-C01-02- 03, the “Consejería de Cultura y Turismo of the Junta de Castilla y León”, and the “Fundación Atapuerca”. A. G-T has a contract from the Ramón y Cajal Program (RYC-2010-06152).
Author’s contribution: R.S.L.; T.G.B.; P.O.; J.L.A.; C.S. and J.M.B.C. designed the project;R.S.L.; T.G.B., P.O.; J.L.A. and C.S. collected data; R.S.L.; T.G.B.; P.O.; J.L.A.; C.S.; R.G.; J.W.;I.M.; A.G.; J.M.B.C and E.C. analyzed the data and wrote the paper.
Competing financial interests: The authors declare no competing financial interests.
About New York University College of Dentistry Founded in 1865, New York University College of Dentistry (NYUCD) is the third oldest and the largest dental school in the US, educating more than 8 percent of all dentists. NYUCD has a significant global reach and provides a level of national and international diversity among its students that is unmatched by any other dental school.