CORNELL UNIVERSITY PRESS RELEASE
FOR RELEASE: April 26, 2011
NOTE TO EDITORS: Miguel Gomez is available for Spanish and English language interviews.
Newswise — ITHACA, N.Y. – As food suppliers attempt to meet the growing demand for local products, a new study finds it’s not always economically or environmentally viable for multi-product industries to focus heavily on local sales.
“The dairy sector is an excellent example for examining the economic consequences of increased localization of food supply chains,” said Miguel Gomez, Cornell University professor of applied economics and management, and co-lead author of “Cost of Localizing a Mutli-Product Food Supply Chain: Dairy in the United States,” which appears in the April 2011 edition of the journal Food Policy.
The study developed an economic model for the U.S. dairy industry that examined assembly, interplant transportation, processing and distribution for all dairy products, including milk, yogurt, cheese and butter. The study showed that the average distance traveled for all U.S. dairy products was about 320 miles from farm to market. Scenarios were developed to compare impacts of increasing local sales, focusing on reducing weighted average source distance, a unit of measurement comparable to food miles.
“We find that increased localization reduces assembly costs while increasing processing and distribution costs,” said Gomez. “The weighted average source distance for some products decreased at the expense of increases in other products.”
The study found although small reductions in food miles are not relatively costly to the supply chain, reductions of more than 45 miles produce larger cost increases. In one scenario, reducing the average distance traveled of beverage milk by ten percent required a 30 percent increase in overall food miles for all other dairy products.
“This study is one of the first to examine food miles from a systems perspective, and to explicitly account for the short-term costs of localization across multiple related products. It shows there are tradeoffs, that localizing is not as simple to achieve as it might seem,” said Charles Nicholson, Cornell adjunct professor of Applied Economics and Management, and co-lead author of the study.
The study provides insights to the U.S. dairy industry, which in 2008 planned to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions 25 percent by 2025, in part through supply chain reductions.
“Our study highlights that localization initiatives must be considered carefully. In fact, localization may not be the best venue to reduce carbon footprint in the case of dairy,” said Gomez.
The study was funded by the David R. Atkinson Center for a Sustainable Future at Cornell University. The April 2011 edition of Food Policy can be viewed at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/03069192.
-30-
RSS