* Some formulations of topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are as effective as oral NSAIDs at providing relief from the pain associated with arthritis in the knees or hands.
* Topical NSAIDs may have benefits over oral NSAIDs for arthritis pain because they can be applied directly to the painful joint and do not cause gastrointestinal distress.
* Topical NSAIDS are most helpful when musculoskeletal pain is located close to the surface of the body and in a localized area, such as joints.
By Glenda Fauntleroy, Contributing Writer
Research Source: The Cochrane Library
Health Behavior News Service
Newswise — For those suffering from osteoarthritis of the knees or hands, applying topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) — in the form of creams, gels and patches — can bring weeks of pain relief, finds a new review by The Cochrane Library.
While oral NSAIDs are more common for managing musculoskeletal pain, reviewers wanted to examine the effectiveness of the topical variety for managing pain for longer than 8 weeks. And while they have been widely used for years in some parts of the world, topical NSAIDs have been slow to become popular in the U.S.
A team of reviewers evaluated 34 studies involving 7,688 adults with chronic musculoskeletal pain for a period of at least 3 months. Participants were organized into groups using either a topical NSAID applied at least once daily, such as diclofenac, ketoprofen, indomethacin, and ibuprofen; a placebo; or an oral NSAID.
The reviewers found the topical NSAID diclofenac was as effective as oral NSAIDs for arthritis in the knee or hand and it gave more participants good pain relief compared to the placebo in studies lasting 8–12 weeks. In four studies, for example, diclofenac gave 60 percent of participants’ pain relief over 8–12 weeks compared to 50 percent of those in the placebo group.
Lead reviewer Sheena Derry, Ph.D., of the Pain Research and Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences at the University of Oxford in the U.K., explained, however, that the use of topical formulations is limited to conditions where the pain is “near to the surface.”
“The benefit of topical over oral NSAIDs is that with topical, the drug stays close to the site of application, so levels in blood and more remote tissues remain very low,” said Derry. “This means you don’t get the gastrointestinal problems that are associated and cause so many problems with oral NSAIDs.”
Roger Chou, M.D., an assistant professor of medicine at Oregon Health & Science University and expert in pain management, said the review findings were similar to his past research and were consistent with what he’d expect to see.
“I think one thing to remember is that for topical medications to work, [the pain] has to be fairly localized,” said Chou. “It would be tough to use these NSAIDs for fibromyalgia where the pain is all over the body, or back pain, where the pain is typically in the deeper structures.”
Chou added that there are many reasons why topical NSAIDs have been slow to gain usage in the U.S., partly because the U.S. Food Administration only approved the first formulations in 2007.
“I also think that many patients and clinicians simply perceive topical NSAIDS to be weaker than pills,” Chou said. “But as we learn more about their effectiveness and perhaps as the cost comes down, people will use them more.”
The Cochrane Collaboration is an international nonprofit, independent organization that produces and disseminates systematic reviews of health care interventions and promotes the search for evidence in the form of clinical trials and other studies of interventions. Visit http://www.cochrane.org for more information.
Derry S, Moore RA, Rabbie R. Topical NSAIDs for chronic musculoskeletal pain in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 9.