Scientists Revolutionize the Creation of Genetically Altered Mice to Model Human Disease
Embargo expired: 2-May-2013 12:00 PM EDT
Source Newsroom: Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research
Newswise — CAMBRIDGE, Mass. (May 2, 2013) – Whitehead Institute Founding Member Rudolf Jaenisch, who helped transform the study of genetics by creating the first transgenic mouse in 1974, is again revolutionizing how genetically altered animal models are created and perhaps even redefining what species may serve as models.
“This new method is a game changer,” says Jaenisch, who is also a professor of biology at MIT. “We can now make a mouse with five mutations in just three to four weeks, whereas the conventional way would take three to four years. And it’s rather straightforward, probably even easier than the conventional way.”
Scientists create models in mice by altering specific genes that have been associated with a given disease. The models allow for the study of the development and course of the disease and the effects of various interventions, including genetic and chemical. For the past 20 years, the creation of such models has remained relatively unchanged: scientists insert a piece of DNA into a mouse embryonic stem (ES) cell, inject the modified cell into a very early-stage embryo, called a blastocyst, then implant this developing ball of cells into a foster female mouse. The whole process can take years and tens of thousands of dollars to establish a mouse strain with, for example, a single copy of a gene “knocked out”. Such knockouts can only be created in very few species, including mice and rats, whose ES cells can be grown and modified reliably.
The new approach used by scientists in Jaenisch’s lab bypasses ES cells to quickly and efficiently produce mice with mutations in both copies of multiple genes. In next week’s issue of the journal Cell, Haoyi Wang, Hui Yang, and Chikdu Shivalila describe their technique, which is based on a system that certain bacteria use to fend off viral attacks.
This is the first time that the system, known as CRISPR (for “clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat”)/Cas (for “CRISPR-associated”), has been used to alter multiple genes in a single multicellular organism. Shivalila says the process is so accessible that he expects other labs to adopt it quickly.
“For any institution or university with a core facility, we think this will be the way they will start making mice carrying specific mutations because it’s a lot faster and so efficient,” says Shivalila, one of Jaenisch’s graduate students. “We were surprised that we could get two genes ‘knocked out’ at four loci very, very efficiently, about 80% efficiency. If we used TALENs, a more recent and complicated development in genetic engineering, we got 30% efficiency for just one gene.”
Because the CRISPR/Cas technique can generate mutant mice even without using ES cells, a limitation of the conventional method for making models, genetic research may no longer be confined to a limited list of model organisms—those for which ES cells exist.
“This breaks down the definition of model organism,” says Wang, a postdoctoral researcher in Jaenisch’s lab. “So now, even with limited resources, any animal with established embryo manipulation procedures could be the subject of genome engineering. With many of the animals’ genomes that have been sequenced, we could use this technology to establish efficient genetic manipulations in more species, to study the unique biology of each, and to learn more about evolution.”
Thus, Wang, Yang, and Shivalila have used CRISPR/Cas to create mouse models only, but the team is excited broaden its application to other animals.
“We also need to see if the CRISPR/Cas system has any unexpected, undesired off-target effects, changes to the genome that we don’t want,” says Yang, a postdoctoral researcher in the Jaenisch lab. “So we need study this further to establish the fidelity of the system. But I think this will be the way to go.”
This research was supported by Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation, Croucher Foundation, National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants R37-HD045022 and R01-CA084198. Jaenisch is an adviser to Stemgent and a cofounder of Fate Therapeutics.
Written by Nicole Giese Rura
* * *
Rudolf Jaenisch's primary affiliation is with Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, where his laboratory is located and all his research is conducted. He is also a professor of biology at Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
* * *
“One-step generation of mice carrying mutations in multiple genes by CRISPR-Cas mediated genome engineering”
Cell, May 9, 2013
Haoyi Wang (1,7), Hui Yang (1,7), Chikdu S. Shivalila (1,2,7) , Meelad M. Dawlaty (1), Albert W. Cheng (1,3), Feng Zhang (5,6), Rudolf Jaenisch (1,3,8).
1.Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
2. Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
3. Computational and Systems Biology Program, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
5. Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, 7 Cambridge Center, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
6. McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Department of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
7. These authors contributed equally to this work.