Non-Traditional Risk Factors Illuminate Racial Disparities in Type 2 Diabetes

Released: 5-Feb-2014 10:00 AM EST
Source Newsroom: Duke Medicine
Contact Information

Available for logged-in reporters only

Citations HSN268201100005C, HHSN268201100006C, HHSN268201100007C, HHSN268201100008C, HHSN268201100009C, HHSN268201100010C, HHSN26820110001; Journal of General Internal Medicine

Newswise — DURHAM, N.C. – Two surprising risk factors – diminished lung function and low serum potassium levels - appear to have nearly the same impact as obesity in explaining why African-Americans are disproportionately prone to developing type 2 diabetes, researchers at Duke Medicine report.

The finding, published in the February print edition of the Journal of General Internal Medicine, clarifies some of the large racial disparities associated with diabetes risk and provides potential new avenues for developing treatments.

According to estimates from the National Health and Nutrition Exam Survey (NHANES), the prevalence of diabetes is 70 percent higher among African-Americans than non-Hispanic whites. Traditional risk factors such as obesity, socio-economic status, diet and behavioral factors account for some of the racial disparities, but not all.

“Other environmental, cultural, metabolic, and genetic factors are likely to contribute to the increased risk of type 2 diabetes among African-Americans,” said lead author Ranee Chatterjee, M.D., MPH, assistant professor of general internal medicine at Duke.

“More recently, non-traditional risk factors have been identified, including dietary factors, markers of chronic inflammation, metabolic abnormalities, genetic markers and others,” Chatterjee said. “The impact of these non-traditional risk factors on people of different races has not been studied, so we set out to see what proportion of the risk they might account for in African-Americans and whites.”

Chatterjee and colleagues analyzed data from nearly 11,200 people with type 2 diabetes, including 8,840 whites and 2,322 African-Americans. Among the African-Americans, many well-known distinctions emerged: there were more women; they were heavier; they had higher blood pressure; and they were more likely to have lower incomes.

Those and other known risk factors accounted for about 42 percent of the increased tendency for type 2 diabetes among African-Americans.

Other, less well-known factors also surfaced, notably low lung function and lower serum potassium levels among the African-Americans who developed diabetes. Compared to obesity, which accounts for a 22 percent increased risk of developing diabetes, low lung function (measured as forced vital capacity) was nearly equally culpable, accounting for a 21.7 percent increased risk among the African-American diabetes patients. Low serum potassium levels accounted for 17.7 percent of the increased risk.

Chatterjee said it is unclear what role reduced lung function and low potassium levels might play in type 2 diabetes; whether they are markers, causes or consequences of the disease needs additional study. She said both factors are typically different among African-Americans and whites.

“We were surprised at the findings,” Chatterjee said. “It’s not clear how these non-traditional risk factors mediate the racial disparities in diabetes risk, but they suggest there are additional biological or environmental causes driving this disparity.
Identifying the mediators of the racial disparities in type 2 diabetes risk may indicate where we need to focus research and development of interventions.”

In addition to Chatterjee, study authors at Duke include David Edleman, with Hsin Chieh Yeh, Frederick L. Brancati, Tariq Shafi and Elizabeth Selvin at Johns Hopkins University; James S. Pankow at the University of Minnesota; and Thomas H. Mosley at the University of Mississippi.

The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute funded the study (HSN268201100005C, HHSN268201100006C, HHSN268201100007C, HHSN268201100008C, HHSN268201100009C, HHSN268201100010C, HHSN268201100011C, and HHSN268201100012C). Additional research support is provided in the publication. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

###


Comment/Share