New SCOTUS Brief Highlights Unconstitutionality of Hobby Lobby Request

Released: 2/11/2014 8:00 AM EST
Source Newsroom: Washington University in St. Louis
Contact Information

Available for logged-in reporters only

Newswise — The popular arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby is seeking a religious exemption from covering certain forms of contraception it would be required to provide under the contraception mandate of the Affordable Health Care Act. The case is headed to the Supreme Court, with oral arguments set to begin this spring.

“Granting the exemption would shift the cost of accommodating Hobby Lobby’s religious exercise to employees who do not share its beliefs,” argues Elizabeth Sepper, JD, associate professor of law at Washington University in St. Louis. “Such cost-shifting violates the Establishment Clause.” The Establishment Clause of the First Amendment “prohibits the government from shifting the costs of accommodating a religion from those who practice it to those who do not.”

Sepper is one of several experts who have authored an amicus curiae brief to the Supreme Court illustrating the unconstitutionality of Hobby Lobby’s case.

The legal brief states that a religious exemption for Hobby Lobby would mean that “business owner[s] in the United States will be empowered to reject insurance coverage for contraception or any other medical prescription, procedure, treatment, or health service it finds religiously objectionable.”

Read the full brief.

Related video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nFlxuS39Fy0


Comment/Share