Newswise — University of Arkansas law professor Danielle Weatherby is available to comment on the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision Monday in the so-called “wedding cake” case, Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission.
In a 7-2 decision, the Court decided that the Colorado state commission violated a baker’s Constitutional protection of religious freedom when it ruled that the baker had violated Colorado’s public accommodation law by choosing not to bake a wedding cake for a same-sex marriage.
Weatherby describes Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission as a classic clash between the First Amendment’s Free Exercise Clause and the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause. She has argued that the case provides an opportunity for the Court to assert that First Amendment freedoms must bow to equal protection principles of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Weatherby’s research focuses on First Amendment jurisprudence and its impact on emerging legal protections for transgender individuals.
Prior to joining the University of Arkansas faculty, Weatherby clerked for Chief Judge Gary L. Sharpe of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York and practiced at the Albany, New York law firm Whiteman, Osterman & Hanna, LLP, where she advised private and public sector clients on a wide range of labor, employment and education law issues.
Weatherby’s recent work has appeared in Washington and Lee Law Review Online, Connecticut Law Review, Pepperdine Law Review, DePaul Law Review, and the New York University Review of Law & Social Change. Leading up to and following the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision on the legality of same-sex marriage, her comments and analysis appeared in the Detroit News, Seattle Times, and Fortune magazine, for which she also has written guest op-ed pieces.
RSS