Newswise — ATLANTA — According to new research findings presented at the 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting, methotrexate did not demonstrate superior efficacy over placebo for pain relief and function evolution at three and 12 months in patients with erosive hand osteoarthritis, but did significantly reduce the progression of joint damage over placebo and seems to facilitate bone remodeling in these patients (Abstract #1759).
Osteoarthritis (OA) is a common joint disease that most often affects middle-age to elderly people. OA is a disease of the entire joint, involving the cartilage, joint lining, ligaments, and bone. It is characterized by breakdown of the cartilage (the tissue that cushions the ends of the bones between joints), bony changes of the joints, deterioration of tendons and ligaments, and various degrees of inflammation of the joint lining (called the synovium).
No studies so far have evaluated the effect of methotrexate (MTX), a disease-modifying antirheumatic drug, in hand osteoarthritis. Researchers conducted this one-year prospective, monocentric, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to examine the drug’s effect on pain and structural progression in patients with symptomatic erosive hand osteoarthritis.
“Erosive hand OA poses problems in terms of pain, function and disability, but especially given the lack of truly effective therapies. The natural evolution of erosive hand OA is characterized by a succession of erosive phases and remodeling. These rearrangements suggest the involvement of pro-inflammatory cytokine cascades known to cause cartilage degradation and bone resorption,” says Prof. Christian Roux, head of the joint unit in the rheumatology department at Cote d’Azur University in France, and the study’s lead author. “In recent years, imaging data have confirmed the presence of inflammation in the joints of these patients. The clinical presentation and imaging data bring this entity closer to inflammatory rheumatism, such as rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis. These similarities have justified for some the use of treatments used in inflammatory rheumatism.”
Sixty-four patients with erosive hand OA in the study were randomized into two groups: taking a dose of 10 mg of MTX per week or a placebo. The study’s primary endpoint was pain assessment at three months. Secondary endpoints were clinical features, including pain measured on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), radiographic features and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 12 months.
At three months, there was no significant difference in the evolution in VAS pain score between both groups: the MTX group’s mean decrease was 17.5 (from 28.4) and the placebo’s mean decrease was 8.4 (from 25.2). Erosive joints progressed significantly more to a remodeling phase in the MTX group than the placebo group, or 27 percent to 15 percent. Joints with joint space loss appeared to be eroding less in the MTX group than in the placebo group, or eight percent to 29 percent. Interleukin-6 level and synovitis findings on MRI scans at baseline were found to be predictive factors for erosive structural evolution of non-erosive joints.
According to the study’s findings, while MTX did not demonstrate superior efficacy over placebo for improvement of pain and functional evolution at three and 12 months in people with EHOA, it did significantly reduce joint damage progression compared to placebo and seems to facilitate bone remodeling. The presence of systemic and local inflammation at baseline predicted erosive progression.
“The study does not demonstrate superior efficacy of MTX over placebo on pain and function in subjects with erosive hand OA. But probably it will be linked to a multifactorial origin of pain in these subjects such as mechanical or inflammatory pain,” says Prof. Roux. “It is possible that we have to treat earlier if we want to have an effect on pain. However, our results show a structural effect of the treatment that facilitates bone remodeling and seems to slow the erosive structural progression of digital osteoarthritis with a seemingly more pronounced effect in patients with early lesions. I think this is a major point. The main complaint for people is the deformity linked to structural evolution in this disease. Our study’s results should encourage new studies to be conducted.”
About the ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
The ACR/ARP Annual Meeting is the premier meeting in rheumatology. With more than 450 sessions and thousands of abstracts, it offers a superior combination of basic science, clinical science, tech-med courses, career enhancement education and interactive discussions on improving patient care. For more information about the meeting, visit https://www.rheumatology.org/Annual-Meeting, or join the conversation on Twitter by following the official #ACR19 hashtag.
About the American College of Rheumatology
The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) is an international medical society representing over 8,500 rheumatologists and rheumatology health professionals with a mission to empower rheumatology professionals to excel in their specialty. In doing so, the ACR offers education, research, advocacy and practice management support to help its members continue their innovative work and provide quality patient care. Rheumatologists are experts in the diagnosis, management and treatment of more than 100 different types of arthritis and rheumatic diseases.
Methotrexate in Patients with Hand Erosive Osteoarthritis Refractory to Usual Treatments: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial
Background/Purpose: No studies have assessed the effect of methotrexate (MTX) in osteoarthritis of the hand (HOA). The purpose of our study was to examine the effect of MTX on pain and structural progression in symptomatic erosive HOA (EHOA).
Methods: This 1-year prospective, monocentric, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (NCT1968405) followed patients with symptomatic EHOA. Patients were randomized into two groups: 10 mg MTX per week or placebo. The primary endpoint was pain assessment at 3 months, and secondary endpoints were clinical features (pain on visual analog scale (VAS)), radiographic features (Verbruggen anatomical radiographic score and Gent University Score System), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 12 months.
Results: Sixty-four EHOA patients were randomized to either the placebo or MTX group. At 3 months, there was no significant difference in the mean decrease in VAS pain score (mm) (MTX: 17.5 (28.4) vs placebo: 8.4 (25.2); p=0.2). Erosive joints progressed significantly more to a remodeling phase in the MTX group than in the placebo group (27% vs 15%) (p=0.03). Joints with joint space loss appeared to be less eroding in the MTX group than in the placebo group (8% vs 29%; p=0.2). Interleukin-6 level (p< 0.0001) and synovitis findings on MRI (p=0.02) at baseline were found to be predictive factors for erosive structural evolution of non-erosive joints.
Conclusions: Our study shows that MTX did not demonstrate superior efficacy over placebo on pain and function evolution at 3 and 12 months in subjects with EHOA. However, MTX significantly reduced the progression of joint damage compared to placebo and seems to facilitate bone remodeling. The presence of systemic and local inflammations at baseline were predictors of erosive progression.