Success in global mangrove conservation efforts boost conservation optimism amongst broader projections of environmental decline

Newswise — More than a decade ago, academics warned that mangrove forests were being lost faster than almost any other ecosystem, including coral reefs and tropical rainforests. But things are looking better. 

An international team of 22 researchers from 24 institutes led by Associate Professor Daniel Friess and Dr Erik Yando of the Department of Geography at the National University of Singapore (NUS) have found that there is now cause for optimism, with the global loss rate of mangrove forests now less alarming than previously suggested. (Please refer to the Annex for the full list of contributing institutions). 

After studying various earlier presented works, the team found that globally, mangrove loss rates have reduced by almost an order of magnitude between the late 20th and early 21st century – from what was previously estimated at one to three per cent per year, to about 0.3 to 0.6 per cent per year, thanks in large part to successful mangrove conservation efforts. This heightens conservation optimism amongst broader projections of environmental decline. 

“The team deduced that the reduction in mangrove global loss rates has resulted from improved monitoring and data access, changing industrial practices, expanded management and protection, increased focus on rehabilitation, and stronger recognition of the ecosystem services provided by mangroves,” explained Assoc Prof Friess. 

A commentary summarising the team’s findings was published in the scientific journal Current Biology on 24 February 2020. This international effort was the result of the Fifth International Mangrove Macrobenthos and Management conference (MMM5), the world’s largest mangrove conference which was held for the first time in Singapore last year. 


Positive change in mangrove conservation 

Mangrove forests occur along the shorelines of more than 100 countries and are incredibly important as they provide a number of critical benefits to people, including protection from coastal erosion and storm as well as cyclone damage, natural filters for pollution and sediment, carbon sequestration which helps to mitigate climate change, and provide millions of people with products such as fuelwood, construction materials and fisheries resources, since mangroves act as nursing grounds for many coastal fishes. 

“There is strong evidence that positive conservation change is occurring. Mangrove conservation has gained substantial momentum, with greater public and government awareness leading to investment and on-the-ground action. However, despite recent mangrove conservation successes, tempered optimism is necessary, as conservation gains are not evenly spread, nor guaranteed into the future,” cautioned Assoc Prof Friess.


Mangroves under threat in emerging deforestation frontiers 

The team gathered that mangroves continue to be threatened by aquaculture, agriculture and urban development across the world, particularly for new deforestation frontiers that are emerging throughout parts of Southeast Asia and West Africa. Southeast Asia is a traditional hot spot of mangrove deforestation as mangroves are cut down to make space for aquaculture ponds, cleared for rice paddy cultivation, and reclaimed for industrial and port development. 

“Emerging deforestation frontiers need to be addressed early. Improved environmental governance and increased public intervention can help secure positive conservation outcomes in these locations. We need to take decisive steps to improve the success and scale of mangrove rehabilitation, and increase the resilience of mangroves to sea-level rise to maintain the current progress in mangrove conservation,” commented Dr Candy Feller, Senior Scientist at the Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, who is one of the contributors to the study.


Maintaining current progress in mangrove conservation 

The team also noted that while mangrove rehabilitation is lauded as a method to offset historical as well as ongoing losses and can yield long-term ecosystem service provision, successful rehabilitation is still a challenge to achieve at scale. 

Current mangrove rehabilitation projects around the world can fail because key ecological thresholds and rehabilitation best practices are ignored – for instance, planting in low-intertidal locations that are not suitable for mangrove growth and using non-native species that can quickly become invasive, which gives rise to myriad ecological impacts on the intertidal zone. 

Another contributor, marine ecologist Professor Karen Diele of Edinburgh Napier University added, “The challenge of mangrove rehabilitation is to ensure that the best practices are executed correctly, including monitoring of rehabilitation projects, both in terms of flora and fauna, to learn from failure and successes. Work is required to overcome key socio-political hurdles. These include lack of training, unclear land tenure, and national governments or NGO targets that incentivise rehabilitation efforts in unsuitable coastal locations. These are not insurmountable challenges and can be addressed through engagement with policy makers and stakeholders.” 

“Ensuring that mangrove conservation gains are not short-lived will require continued research, policy attention, and renewed efforts to improve the success of mangrove rehabilitation at a scale that will be ecologically impactful,” said Dr Yando, Research Fellow at the NUS Department of Geography.

Meanwhile, Assoc Prof Friess and his team will continue to monitor mangrove deforestation and conduct studies to assess the benefits and values of mangroves in Southeast Asia.


Annex: Contributing Institutions 

  • Department of Geography, National University of Singapore
  • Mangrove Specialist Group, International Union for the Conservation of Nature
  • Leibniz Centre for Tropical Marine Research
  • Institute for Coastal & Marine Research, Department of Botany, Nelson Mandela University
  • The Swire Institute of Marine Science and School of Biological Sciences, The University of Hong Kong
  • Department of Biology, University of Florence
  • Working Land and Seascapes, Smithsonian Institution
  • Smithsonian Marine Station
  • Ecology and Environment Research Centre, Department of Natural Sciences, Manchester Metropolitan University
  • Department of Geography, University of California
  • Australian Rivers Institute, School of Environment and Science, Griffith University
  • Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Macquarie University
  • Laboratory of Systems Ecology and Resource Management, Université Libre de Bruxelles
  • Ecology & Biodiversity, Laboratory of Plant Biology and Nature Management, Vrije Universiteit Brussel
  • School of Applied Sciences, Edinburgh Napier University
  • St Abbs Marine Station
  • Smithsonian Environmental Research Centre
  • Faculty of Geosciences, University of Bremen
  • Simon F S Li Marine Science Laboratory, The Chinese University of Hong Kong
  • Institute of Water and Environment, Florida International University
  • School of Earth, Atmospheric and Life Sciences, University of Wollongong
  • Institute of Ocean and Earth Sciences, University of Malaya
  • Division of Science, Yale-NUS College
  • Guangxi Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Conservation, College of Forestry, Guangxi University


Journal Link: Current Biology, VOLUME 30, ISSUE 4, PR153-R154, FEBRUARY 24, 2020