Newswise — New York, NY—April 13, 2020—Photosynthesis on Earth is regulated by plant phenology—how plant life cycles interact with the climate—and environmental conditions, both of which changed substantially in recent decades. Unlike early-season photosynthesis which is mostly driven by warming temperatures or the onset of the wet season, late-season photosynthesis can be limited by several factors, such as plant life cycle and radiation, and its underlying mechanisms are less understood. Late-season photosynthesis on land contributes greatly to annual total carbon fixation and is sensitive to climate. Scientists generally agree that temperature limitation on late-season photosynthesis will alleviate with warming but the effects of water availability are highly uncertain. 

A new Columbia Engineering study shows that increased water stress—higher frequency of drought due to higher temperatures, is going to constrain the phenological cycle: in effect, by shutting down photosynthesis, it will generate a lower carbon uptake at the end of the season, thus contributing to increased global warming. The researchers used both remote sensing data and in-situ observations to analyze the temperature and water limitations on the end of photosynthesis date. They found that water limitation on late-season photosynthesis is regulated by both soil water and mean annual temperature. Earth system models have predicted warming and soil drying over most of the land surface by 2100, and so it is clear that water availability will become increasingly important as a limiting factor for late-season photosynthesis and carbon uptake. 

“We wanted to understand what the driving factor of plant photosynthesis is during the late growing season, and how it will change in the future,” says Pierre Gentine, associate professor of earth and environmental engineering and affiliated with the Earth Institute, who led the study published today in Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences. “Our study is a very good example of how advances in remote sensing technologies can be used to solve long-lasting questions like this one.” 

The team used both machine learning and remote sensing to generate a new dataset for mapping global plant photosynthesis. They found a contrasting spatial pattern of temperature and water limitations on photosynthesis at the end of the growing season. The threshold separating these was determined by the balance between energy availability and soil water supply. Precipitation and temperature had important yet opposite impacts on the end of the growing season photosynthesis for ecosystems at different locations: if plant photosynthesis in some areas is limited by precipitation (positive relationship with precipitation), temperature is likely to have a negative effect, and vice versa. 

“We are the first to show that the balance between soil water and energy input into the ecosystem determines whether the system is limited by precipitation or by temperature,” says the study’s lead author Yao Zhang, a former postdoc research scientist with Gentine and now a postdoc scholar at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. “As temperature limitation diminishes, more soil water is needed to support increased vegetation activity, especially during the late growing season. CMIP5 models project future warming and drying especially during late season, both of which should further expand the regions with limited water, causing large variations and potential decreases in photosynthesis.” 

This study was a collaboration of Columbia Engineering, Columbia’s Earth Institute, Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory, and NASA Jet proportion laboratory. The researchers are now using their dataset to better understand the lagged effect of precipitation and how to get early warning signals for drought. 

About the Study 

The study is titled: “Large and projected strengthening moisture limitation on end-of-season photosynthesis.” 

Authors are: Yao Zhanga,b,*, Nicholas Parazooc, A. Park Williamsd, Sha Zhoua,d,e, Pierre Gentinea,e,*
aDepartment of Earth and Environmental Engineering, Columbia Engineering
bClimate and Ecosystem Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
cCalifornia Institute of Technology, Jet Propulsion Laboratory
dLamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University
eEarth Institute, Columbia University 

The study was supported by NASA Advanced Information Systems Technology (AIST) #NASA NNH16ZDA001N-AIST, NASA ROSES Terrestrial hydrology #NNH17ZDA00IN-THP and NOAA MAPP #NA17OAR4310127. 

The authors declare no financial or other conflicts of interest. 

### 

LINKS:

Paper: www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1914436117
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1914436117
http://engineering.columbia.edu/
https://www.pnas.org/
https://engineering.columbia.edu/faculty/pierre-gentine
https://eee.columbia.edu/
http://ei.columbia.edu/ 

### 

Columbia Engineering

Columbia Engineering, based in New York City, is one of the top engineering schools in the U.S. and one of the oldest in the nation. Also known as The Fu Foundation School of Engineering and Applied Science, the School expands knowledge and advances technology through the pioneering research of its more than 220 faculty, while educating undergraduate and graduate students in a collaborative environment to become leaders informed by a firm foundation in engineering. The School’s faculty are at the center of the University’s cross-disciplinary research, contributing to the Data Science Institute, Earth Institute, Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute, Precision Medicine Initiative, and the Columbia Nano Initiative. Guided by its strategic vision, “Columbia Engineering for Humanity,” the School aims to translate ideas into innovations that foster a sustainable, healthy, secure, connected, and creative humanity.

 

SEE ORIGINAL STUDY