Newswise — PHILADELPHIA— Even though the use of rhythm control strategies for treating Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation (AF), a common abnormal heart rhythm, have increased overall in the United States, patients from racial and ethnic minority groups and those with lower income were less likely to receive rhythm control treatment - often the preferred treatment - according to new research from the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania. The study is published in the JAMA Network Open.
“Research has demonstrated the pervasive impact of structural racism on health outcomes among minoritized patients. We know, for instance, that there is less use of novel cardiovascular therapies among Black, Latinx, and patients of lower socioeconomic status,” said the study’s lead author, Lauren Eberly, MD, MPH, a cardiology fellow at the University of Pennsylvania. “That’s why we wanted to evaluate the rates of antiarrhythmic drugs and catheter ablation and investigate for the presence of inequities to see how we can do better from an equity standpoint.”
Atrial Fibrillation is the most common sustained heart rhythm disorder, and is the cause of significant complications including heart failure and stroke, which can be deadly for some patients. The two forms of rhythm control are antiarrhythmic drugs and catheter ablation, which aims to eliminate the sources of atrial fibrillation. Evidence suggests that when doctors pursue these rhythm control strategies early in the course of the patient’s disease, they are more likely to successfully control the condition, and long term cardiovascular outcomes are improved.
Researchers examined data from October 2015 to June 2019 from more than 100,000 diverse, commercially insured patients, and found that from 2016 to 2019 the cumulative percentage of patients treated with antiarrhythmic drugs and catheter ablation increased from 1.6 percent to 3.8 percent. Despite this overall increase, patients with Latinx ethnicity and those who lived in zip codes with lower median household income were less likely to receive catheter ablation treatment, and Black and lower-income patients were less likely to be prescribed antiarrhythmic drugs or treated with catheter ablation.
Overall, patients living in areas with median household incomes of less than $50,000 were 39 percent less likely to receive catheter ablation compared with those with a median household income of $100,000 or more.
According to researchers, the number of cardiology visits by each patient was one of the strongest factors associated with rhythm control and catheter ablation use, stressing the importance of access to care. The findings suggest that reduced access to specialty care, including cardiovascular care for Black patients, is a potential reason for differences in treatments.
“As evidence builds regarding the benefits of early rhythm control and particularly catheter ablation, we must ensure that all our patients benefit equally” said the study’s senior author, David Frankel, MD, Associate Professor of Medicine and Director of the Cardiac Electrophysiology Fellowship.
Eberly also hopes that in addition this awareness will push primary care providers and non-cardiac providers to more readily consider rhythm-control strategies or referral to a specialist, particularly for those patients who have been historically marginalized by the healthcare system.
Funding was provided by the Mark Marchlinski Research and Education Fund.
Penn Medicine is one of the world’s leading academic medical centers, dedicated to the related missions of medical education, biomedical research, and excellence in patient care. Penn Medicine consists of the Raymond and Ruth Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania (founded in 1765 as the nation’s first medical school) and the University of Pennsylvania Health System, which together form a $8.6 billion enterprise.
The Perelman School of Medicine has been ranked among the top medical schools in the United States for more than 20 years, according to U.S. News & World Report's survey of research-oriented medical schools. The School is consistently among the nation's top recipients of funding from the National Institutes of Health, with $494 million awarded in the 2019 fiscal year.
The University of Pennsylvania Health System’s patient care facilities include: the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania and Penn Presbyterian Medical Center—which are recognized as one of the nation’s top “Honor Roll” hospitals by U.S. News & World Report—Chester County Hospital; Lancaster General Health; Penn Medicine Princeton Health; and Pennsylvania Hospital, the nation’s first hospital, founded in 1751. Additional facilities and enterprises include Good Shepherd Penn Partners, Penn Medicine at Home, Lancaster Behavioral Health Hospital, and Princeton House Behavioral Health, among others.
Penn Medicine is powered by a talented and dedicated workforce of more than 43,900 people. The organization also has alliances with top community health systems across both Southeastern Pennsylvania and Southern New Jersey, creating more options for patients no matter where they live.
Penn Medicine is committed to improving lives and health through a variety of community-based programs and activities. In fiscal year 2019, Penn Medicine provided more than $583 million to benefit our community.