President Trump’s executive order withdrawing the clean water rule known as Waters of the United States could have far-reaching implications, a Virginia Tech expert said.

“Ultimately, the repercussions of poor water quality impact not only our own drinking water, but also our economy,” said Durelle “Scotty” Scott, an associate professor of biological systems engineering. “One of the main concepts behind federal protection is that water runs down hill, across political boundaries. Balancing needs of upstream and downstream water demands requires holistic management and protection.” (Scott’s full bio)

The clean water rule, one of former President Barack Obama’s major environmental regulations, was written to clarify and establish the federal government has the authority to regulate smaller streams and headwaters, and about other water sources such as wetlands. “We all have a stake in clean water and protection of streams and wetlands. Fundamentally, wetlands and headwater streams lead to larger streams and rivers,” Scott said. “Ultimately, protecting our nation’s small streams and wetlands provide inexpensive ecosystem services throughout river corridors, something that would be much more expensive to fix “downstream.”

In the Chesapeake Bay alone, recreational and commercial fishing contributes over $1 billion to the economy. Poor water quality increases filtration costs for drinking water municipalities, and can drive businesses away that require clean water.

Today, we have the opportunity to maintain and even increase agricultural production on the landscape while protecting river corridors. Technological and scientific advancement provides opportunities for targeted management practices, Scott said.

BackgroundWithin the United States, there are over 3 million miles of streams that range from the smallest headwaters to the mighty Mississippi. The smallest streams, known as headwaters, represent over 50 percent of the total river miles. Wetlands are also found throughout the landscape, and are hydrologically connected to the river corridor.

Research over the last two decades has shown that headwater streams and wetlands profoundly influence downstream water quality and water quantity, Scott said. Collectively, wetlands and small streams serve to reduce downstream flooding, reduce downstream pollution, and provide habitat to support aquatic ecosystems.

Across the U.S., surface water withdrawals from streams and lakes are the most common water source for drinking water. Within Virginia alone, there are over 800 surface water withdrawals, where 230 are for drinking water supply. Other uses include manufacturing and agriculture, both of which require clean water. For example, one of the primary questions of breweries when considering a new plant (e.g. Deschutes in Roanoke) is the quality of the source water.

Excess pollution (e.g. nutrients) result in downstream degradation in larger rivers, lakes, and coastal waters. When nitrogen and phosphorus is abundant, plants and algae grow unchecked resulting in poor water quality (e.g. large swings in dissolved oxygen and pH). The ecosystem becomes unable to support higher aquatic life (e.g. fish), and has the potential of creating algal blooms that limit recreational opportunities and can impact human health. Toxic algal blooms near Toledo’s drinking water supply provide one example; over the last several years there have been hundreds of documented algal blooms and hypoxic (low oxygen) zones throughout coastal zones worldwide.

Request an interviewTo secure a print or broadcast interview with Scott, contact Bill Foy by email at [email protected]; or by phone at 540-998-0288 or 540-231-8719.

Our studioVirginia Tech's television and radio studios can broadcast live HD audio and video to networks, news agencies, and affiliates interviewing Virginia Tech faculty, students, and staff. The university does not charge for use of its studios. Video is transmitted by LTN Global Communications and fees may apply.