Modeling Agriculture Matters for Carbon Cycling

Newswise — To understand Earth’s changing climate, scientists often turn to science-based computer simulations. Researchers strive to make these Earth system models as accurate as possible. Factors such as wind currents, air quality, and weather patterns all play a role. But current modeling has often overlooked one important activity: agriculture.

Now, research from Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) published in JGR Biogeosciences has found that more realistically representing the effect of agricultural crops in an Earth system model can increase the model's skill by 40 percent.

“The differences between observations and previous model results were quite large,” said PNNL Earth scientist Ben Bond-Lamberty. “Our new approach helps remove biases and errors from the model. This means it should be easier to see the fingerprint of climate change in carbon fluxes from these areas.”

It is well understood that agriculture plays an important role in the carbon cycle. Through photosynthesis, plants take carbon dioxide from the air and use it to feed themselves and, eventually, us. While all crops contribute to carbon cycling, changing agricultural processes can significantly affect the amount of carbon uptake. Indeed, one potential avenue for mitigating climate change involves using agriculture to trap more carbon dioxide.

“Agriculture impacts both local and regional climate,” said Eva Sinha, PNNL Earth scientist and lead author of the study. “That makes it an important part of climate models. The better we can represent the reality of agriculture, from the type of crops to land management practices, the more accurate our climate projections will be.”

Modeling matters

Modeling is an essential tool for studying climate. Historical weather patterns help researchers look back to past climate patterns, but understanding the future requires projecting different possible outcomes. Earth system models are the only way to project different possible climate futures at high resolution across the globe. The closer they reflect real-world conditions, the better they can make predictions. The PNNL-led team introduced crop rotation into the land component of the Department of Energy’s Energy Exascale Earth System Model. Researchers use this model to study global climate, including how it interacts with energy-relevant science.

Previously, the simulations treated all cropland as the same throughout the year. The new representation allowed the team to reflect different types of land use, specifically the corn-soybean crop rotations often planted across the U.S. Midwest. When the research team ran the model with crop rotation represented, the results for carbon exchanged between the crops and the air were significantly closer to observed values.

Observed values serve an important role in evaluating model results. An accurate model should produce results that are relatively close to observations, given the right inputs. Because incorporating different crop representations brought the model results significantly closer to observed values, the model will likely give more accurate representations of future carbon cycling.

“We believed that more accurately representing crops would improve the model,” said Sinha. “But we didn’t expect it would be this much better.”

Managing crops, managing carbon