The claim that lockdowns end more lives than they save is misleading

University of Bristol
24-Mar-2021 9:20 AM EDT, by University of Bristol

Fact Check By: Dr Howard H.Z. Thom, Research Fellow in Statistical Modelling and lecturer in Health Economics at the University of Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol

Truthfulness: Mostly False


The data shows lockdowns end more lives than they save.

Claim Publisher and Date: John Tierney, New York Post on 2021-03-22

In response to the opinion piece published in the New York Post on March 22, 2021, by John Tierney, titled, "The data shows lockdowns end more lives than they save"

The central claim of this article isn't supported by the evidence provided by the author. 

The author claims "The United States will experience more than 1 million excess deaths in the United States during the next two decades as a result of the massive “unemployment shock” last year, according to a team of researchers from Johns Hopkins and Duke, who analyzed the effects of past recessions on mortality."

The author does not provide a reference but the article is likely that of Bianchi and colleagues ( This is an excellent study but wrongly assumes that unemployment and economic losses are attributable solely to government restrictions. Evidence on which is the greater factor is limited, but the IMF, for example, used changes in travel, electricity use and unemployment insurance claims at the start of 2020 to show economic conditions deteriorated before government restrictions were introduced and began to recover before they were lifted ( It concluded that lockdowns and voluntary social distancing had a near-identical economic impact. A further preprint study found that consumer spending in Denmark and Sweden fell by similar amounts during the first wave, despite Denmark introducing a stringent lockdown and Sweden using mostly voluntary restrictions ( You could go further and compare the IMF GDP 2020 growth and WHO death rates of Sweden (-4.7%, with ~54,000 deaths per million), to those of its less lenient neighbours Denmark (-4.5% with ~33,000 deaths per million), Finland (-4.0% with ~7500 deaths per million), and Norway (-2.8%, with ~11,000 deaths per million). It seems that lockdowns save lives and protect the economy, thus preventing more deaths from economic deprivation. 

It is therefore grossly misleading to attribute the 1 million excess deaths solely to response. 

The author also claims "When the 50 states are ranked according to the stringency of their lockdown restrictions, you can see one obvious pattern: The more restrictive the state, the higher the unemployment rate. But there is no pattern in the rate of COVID-19 mortality."

This ignores the confounding effect of severity of local epidemic and the question of what would have happened if there had been no restrictions. States with more restrictions may be responding to a more severe epidemic, which would have a related impact of more severe unemployment (see response to point above). Differences in absolute mortality are meaningless on their own as they ignore important demographic effects (density, urban vs rural, age, and comorbidities) that would lead to more severe epidemics in the absence of response. As an illustration, consider my own analysis of lives saved in the UK, Ireland, Spain, Germany, and Sweden up to 22nd July, counted as the first wave of the pandemic ( Simply comparing deaths per 1000 would suggest that the UK (6/1000), Spain (6/1000) and Sweden (6/1000) did worse than Germany (1/1000) and Ireland (4/1000). However, calculating deaths prevented per thousand compared to an R0=2.7 "no mitigation" scenario tells a different story, with Ireland (40/1000) and Sweden (56/1000) saving fewer lives than the UK (58/1000), Spain (60/10000) and Germany (60/1000). These patterns are likely driven by demographics as much by stringency of response. 

Register for reporter access to contact details
Filters close

Showing results

110 of 40
Released: 7-Jul-2021 3:20 PM EDT
Study does not determine COVID vaccines kill 2 for every 3 they save

A study is misinterpreted to convey that the COVID vaccines kill 2 people for every three that are saved, despite the study being under serious scrutiny.

Released: 1-Jul-2021 3:05 PM EDT
The approved coronavirus vaccines do not contain metals and are not magnetic

All three coronavirus vaccines approved for emergency use in the United States are free from metals.

Released: 25-May-2021 3:00 PM EDT
Debunking the claim that vaccines cause new COVID-19 variants

In an interview in the French documentary "Hold-Up," Luc Montagnier, a French virologist and recipient of the 2008 Nobel Prize in Medicine for his discovery of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), claimed that Covid-19 vaccines are creating new variants in various parts of the world. He believes that the ongoing vaccinations across the world is an ”enormous mistake.” ”The history books will show that because it is the vaccination that is creating the variants.” Multiple French social media posts that have been shared by thousands have also claimed that COVID-19 vaccines are causing variants of the virus to emerge. We find these claims to be false. There is no evidence the vaccines are creating more variants.

Released: 21-May-2021 12:00 PM EDT
Are businesses violating HIPAA if they ask their patrons if they've been vaccinated? No.

As business rework their mask requirements such as lifting face mask requirements for customers who are vaccinated against COVID-19, questions about medical privacy are back in the spotlight. The question of whether it's okay to ask a maskless patron if they've been vaccinated has come into focus. Vaccine opponents, including members of the U.S. Congress, are once again claiming that the HIPAA federal privacy law protects individuals from being asked about their vaccination status. We find this claim to be false.

Released: 7-May-2021 1:40 PM EDT
There is no evidence that vaccines could cause harm to people who have recovered from COVID-19

An article published by Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s anti-vaccination organization and widely shared on social media questions the need of vaccinating those who’ve already recovered from COVID-19. The article says there’s a "potential risk of harm, including death" in getting the vaccines. We report this claim as false. There is no evidence that vaccinating people who had previously had COVID is resulting in an increased risk of adverse events.

Released: 29-Apr-2021 1:05 PM EDT
The claim made by leaders of Miami school that vaccinated teachers can negatively affect non-vaccinated staff and students is completely false

There is no evidence any vaccinated people may be transmitting something from their bodies to non-vaccinated people.

Newswise: Claims That Masks Are Irrelevant Put People at Risk
Released: 22-Apr-2021 4:05 PM EDT
Claims That Masks Are Irrelevant Put People at Risk
American Thoracic Society (ATS)

The claim that you don’t have to wear a mask after receiving the COVID-19 vaccine has been circulating on social media and told by conservative media pundits such as Tucker Carlson and Rep. Jim Jordan.

Released: 30-Mar-2021 2:40 PM EDT
Texan doctor baselessly claims that the mRNA vaccines aren’t actually vaccines at all

A Texas doctor, in a widely shared video, falsely claims the vaccines don’t provide protection and that they’re actually “experimental gene therapy.”

Newswise: Opinion Piece on Lockdowns Misinterprets Data
Released: 24-Mar-2021 1:35 PM EDT
Opinion Piece on Lockdowns Misinterprets Data
American Thoracic Society (ATS)

A recent opinion piece in the NY Post ignores evidence supporting the effectiveness of lockdowns.

Released: 24-Mar-2021 9:20 AM EDT
The claim that lockdowns end more lives than they save is misleading
University of Bristol

Dr Howard H.Z. Thom of the University of Bristol says it is grossly misleading to attribute the 1 million excess deaths solely to response.

Showing results

110 of 40