Iowa State University

Study finds U.S. policies could have negative implications for Africa

19-Nov-2019 1:10 PM EST, by Iowa State University

Newswise — A new study finds that while the current United States administration’s policies in Africa may appear undeveloped, there are distinct trends and tendencies that have the potential to negatively impact Africa’s economic growth.

The study was published in the peer-reviewed academic journal Africa Today. It was co-authored by Francis Owusu, professor and chair of community and regional planning at Iowa State University; Padraig Carmody, associate professor of geography at Trinity College Dublin; and Ricardo Reboredo, Ph.D. candidate at Trinity College Dublin.

The researchers studied the nature and impacts of the Trump administration’s policies in Africa, focusing on trade relations, development aid, foreign direct investments (FDI), security and terrorism concerns, and climate change. They also looked at whether China and the United Kingdom will seek to strengthen their relationships in Africa given relative U.S. disengagement.

“Reduced engagement has both real human costs in Africa, in addition to storing up problems for the future,” Owusu said. “The general U.S. disengagement with Africa is even more troubling, given the growing importance of Africa’s role in global economic and political affairs and the growing interest by other powers in engaging with Africa.”

The study found that the Trump administration’s approach to Africa involves “selective delinking” from various relations, including aid, trade and investment. This paper delves into the history of the U.S.-Africa relationship, and examines recent policies and events that illuminate current and future globalization impacts on Africa.


Filters close

Showing results

110 of 5511
Released: 30-Sep-2020 9:55 AM EDT
Political Polarization: Often Not as Bad as We Think
Columbia University, Mailman School of Public Health

As politics grows increasingly polarized, a new global study finds people often exaggerate political differences and negative feelings of those on the opposite side of the political divide, and this misperception can be reduced by informing them of the other side’s true feelings. The study replicates earlier research in the United States, finding the phenomenon to be generalizable across 25 countries.

Released: 29-Sep-2020 4:05 PM EDT
Experts ready to provide insight on 2020 elections
Florida State University

By: Mark Blackwell Thomas | Published: September 29, 2020 | 3:51 pm | SHARE: With the 2020 election cycle in full swing, American voters find themselves with no shortage of issues to consider when deciding which candidate has earned the right to help tackle them. Racial unrest, historic wildfires and a pandemic that’s infected millions and led to 200,000 American deaths are among the factors shaping an electorate that’s polarized like never before.

Newswise: mercedes-mehling-XmSdvDOuRZg-unsplash-scaled.jpg
Released: 29-Sep-2020 3:50 PM EDT
WashU Expert: Withholding federal funds from ‘anarchist jurisdictions’ violates Constitution
Washington University in St. Louis

The U.S. Department of Justice Sept. 21 issued a list of “anarchist jurisdictions,” pursuant to an order from President Donald Trump to review federal funding for cities where violence or vandalism has occurred adjacent to protests.If the Trump administration withholds federal funds from these jurisdictions based on the “anarchist” designation, that withholding of funds would violate the Constitution in at least two ways, says a Constitutional law expert at Washington University in St.

Showing results

110 of 5511