Expert Pitch
SUNY Buffalo State

Buffalo State College's Peter Yacobucci on Changes at the Supreme Court

23-Apr-2020 10:40 AM EDT, by SUNY Buffalo State

The coronavirus pandemic has touched nearly every aspect of life in America, including the United States Supreme Court, an institution noted for its resistance to change over the years. 

Because of concerns over the pandemic, the Supreme Court will hear arguments by teleconference in May. In conjunction, real-time, live audio of the arguments will be made available to the public. This is a first for the court. 

Arguments will be held May 4–6 and 11–13. Ten cases are on the docket (PDF, 75 KB).

Buffalo State College’s Peter Yacobucci, associate professor of political science, has studied the Supreme Court for over 25 years. He spoke about the court’s unprecedented decision, and what the future implications of the decision to hold public arguments may be. 

Yacobucci is an expert in constitutional law who has written and presented widely on the Supreme Court and has served as a political analyst for several local media outlets. He also volunteers with the Erie County Board of Elections.

How unusual is this decision by the Supreme Court?

The Supreme Court, probably more than any other institution in our government, is bound in tradition and routine. There’s a decorum in front of the Supreme Court that you just don’t see in any other government branch at any level. There’s been more change happening in the last four weeks with the Supreme Court than in the last hundred years. We’ve never had this before. The only thing that comes anywhere even remotely close to that is during the 1918 flu pandemic, they delayed cases by one month. They heard cases during World War II, and during the Great Depression. They stayed open when the government was shut down. The Supreme Court goes to work no matter what. That they are changing the way they operate is pretty dramatic, and it could have dramatic implications for the court going forward.

Why did the court decide to open arguments to the public?

It’s unclear why the court decided to do this. There is no reason why the court couldn’t have delayed the release of the audio tape per usual. There’s lots of speculation, though. Some is from the technical side, about not having staff on site to check for accuracy, and the fear that the audio would be hacked before posting. Other speculation is more political, in not wanting President Trump to cherry-pick and tweet portions of oral arguments that benefit his side before full audio is released.

Will this change how the court operates in terms of access?

Once the COVID crisis is over, and we go back to normal times, it's going to be really difficult to go back and say, “Well, we’re going to go back to straight oral arguments, where we’re not going to allow in the press, we’re not going to allow in audio recordings of these.” The concern has always been that letting the media in and letting the public in would lead to grandstanding by the lawyers or even by the members of the court themselves. We don’t know if that’s going to happen, but just the technical aspects of it are going to be fascinating to watch.

Are there concerns about holding the arguments over a conference call?

In the court, there is not a person in charge of the oral arguments. It just opens up, and each advocate makes their argument. And then the justices, if they want, interrupt. They’re considered a “hot bench,” and some will do it more actively than others. If you’ve ever been on a conference call, there’s those weird delays and pauses, because we don’t have the visual cues that we use to enter and exit a conversation. They might be stumbling all over each other, and that’s assuming that all the technology works. Federal courts have begun to do this, and so have the appellate courts at the state level. There have been a lot of issues where they’ve had lawyers dropped during the middle of an argument. They’ve had justices that have been dropped. And then what happens? I think that certainly brings in due process. If I lose the case, and I know that one of the justices on the Supreme Court couldn’t hear a few minutes of my oral arguments, I’m certainly going to come back to the court and say, “Wait a minute. I didn't get a fair hearing.”

Will this change how the advocates give their arguments?

This is all new to the lawyers. When they’re giving their argument, they’re training their eyes on the justices, and they’re looking at how the judges are reacting. And they’re adjusting their argument on the fly from what they’re seeing. They won’t get any of that. It’ll be interesting to see what happens.




Filters close

Showing results

110 of 2528
Released: 10-Jul-2020 3:05 PM EDT
Simple blood test can predict severity of COVID-19 for some patients
University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

An early prognosis factor that could be a key to determining who will suffer greater effects from COVID-19, and help clinicians better prepare for these patients, may have been uncovered by researchers at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth). Results of the findings were published today in the International Journal of Laboratory Hematology.

Released: 10-Jul-2020 12:50 PM EDT
Genetic ‘fingerprints’ of first COVID-19 cases help manage pandemic
University of Sydney

A new study published in the world-leading journal Nature Medicine, reveals how genomic sequencing and mathematical modelling gave important insights into the ‘parentage’ of cases and likely spread of the disease in New South Wales.

Released: 10-Jul-2020 12:35 PM EDT
Our itch to share helps spread COVID-19 misinformation
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)

To stay current about the Covid-19 pandemic, people need to process health information when they read the news. Inevitably, that means people will be exposed to health misinformation, too, in the form of false content, often found online, about the illness.

Newswise: Pandemic Inspires Framework for Enhanced Care in Nursing Homes
Released: 10-Jul-2020 12:25 PM EDT
Pandemic Inspires Framework for Enhanced Care in Nursing Homes
University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing

As of May 2020, nursing home residents account for a staggering one-third of the more than 80,000 deaths due to COVID-19 in the U.S. This pandemic has resulted in unprecedented threats—like reduced access to resources needed to contain and eliminate the spread of the virus—to achieving and sustaining care quality even in the best nursing homes. Active engagement of nursing home leaders in developing solutions responsive to the unprecedented threats to quality standards of care delivery is required.

Newswise: General Electric Healthcare Chooses UH to Clinically 
Evaluate First-of-its-kind Imaging System
Released: 10-Jul-2020 12:15 PM EDT
General Electric Healthcare Chooses UH to Clinically Evaluate First-of-its-kind Imaging System
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center

University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center physicians completed evaluation for the GE Healthcare Critical Care Suite, and the technology is now in daily clinical practice – flagging between seven to 15 collapsed lungs per day within the hospital. No one on the team could have predicted the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, but this technology and future research with GEHC may enhance the capability to improve care for COVID-19 patients in the ICU. Critical Care Suite is now assisting in COVID and non-COVID patient care as the AMX 240 travels to intensive care units within the hospital.

Released: 10-Jul-2020 11:50 AM EDT
COVID-19 Can Be Transmitted in the Womb, Reports Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal
Wolters Kluwer Health: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins

A baby girl in Texas – born prematurely to a mother with COVID-19 – is the strongest evidence to date that intrauterine (in the womb) transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) can occur, reports The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, the official journal of The European Society for Paediatric Infectious Diseases. The journal is published in the Lippincott portfolio by Wolters Kluwer.

Released: 10-Jul-2020 9:45 AM EDT
How COVID-19 Shifted Inpatient Imaging Utilization
Harvey L. Neiman Health Policy Institute

As medical resources shifted away from elective and non-urgent procedures toward emergent and critical care of COVID-19 patients, departments were forced to reconfigure their personnel and resources. In particular, many Radiology practices rescheduled non-urgent and routine imaging according to recommendations from the American College of Radiology (ACR). This new Harvey L. Neiman Health Policy Institute study, published online in the Journal of American College of Radiology (JACR), evaluates the change in the inpatient imaging volumes and composition mix during the COVID-19 pandemic within a large healthcare system.

access_time Embargo lifts in 2 days
Embargo will expire: 12-Jul-2020 7:00 PM EDT Released to reporters: 10-Jul-2020 9:00 AM EDT

A reporter's PressPass is required to access this story until the embargo expires on 12-Jul-2020 7:00 PM EDT The Newswise PressPass gives verified journalists access to embargoed stories. Please log in to complete a presspass application. If you have not yet registered, please Register. When you fill out the registration form, please identify yourself as a reporter in order to advance to the presspass application form.

Released: 10-Jul-2020 9:00 AM EDT
Team is first in Texas to investigate convalescent plasma for prevention of COVID-19 onset and progression
University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

A research team is the first in Texas to investigate whether plasma from COVID-19 survivors can be used in outpatient settings to prevent the onset and progression of the virus in two new clinical trials at UTHealth.


Showing results

110 of 2528

close
0.79144