Expert Pitch
University of Georgia

Expert Q&A: North Korea Is a Rational Actor

5-Jul-2017 9:05 AM EDT, by University of Georgia

Andrew P. Owsiak is an Associate Professor in the Department of International Affairs at the University of Georgia. Owsiak's research examines rivalries between countries, the causes of international conflict, crisis diplomacy, alliance structures and their behaviors, and peace processes and conflict management.

Members of the media are free to use these comments on the recent tensions involving North Korea or contact Owsiak for more expert opinions. UGA has a VideoLink studio available for broadcast interviews.

Q: Why does North Korea engage in threatening behavior toward South Korea and others? 

A: The reasons countries like North Korea engage in threatening behavior might be offensive or defensive. North Korea’s behavior often is classified as falling within the offensive category — that is, many think that they threaten South Korea and others because they have inherently aggressive intentions (for example, wanting to take land from South Korea or provoke a fight to enhance their reputation). In reality, I think much of their behavior comes from a defensive motivation. They are isolated from the international community — partly as a result of their decisions and partly as a result of the international community’s decisions. Moreover, from their perspective, they have a long-standing threat on their southern border (South Korea), a major state that regularly threatens them and assists their southern neighbor (United States), other states that cooperate with both of these actors, and few allies. This strategic situation will make them feel threatened, encircled, and therefore, insecure, which then prompts them to threaten others as a way both to signal their strength and, relatedly, to deter others from attacking them.

Q: When tensions intensify, what steps are most likely to lead to war/violence as opposed to peace?

A: In general, steps that escalate tension involve the threat, display, or use of military force. A country often intends these actions to deter aggression from other countries — that is, to decrease the possibility of war — because they perceive such actions to be clear signals of how willing they are to fight over the issues under dispute and how competent they are with the military should a fight occur. Unfortunately, these actions often have the opposite effect; they can (even if unintentionally) instead suggest that the acting country itself has aggressive intentions (not defensive ones). The target country of such actions therefore often responds with military force as well, so as to not be caught off-guard if a war occurs and to signal its strength and how important the issue under dispute is to them, thereby escalating the conflict instead of de-escalating it. 

Q: Is North Korea acting “irrationally”? 

A: This question arises often. Essentially, people asking it want to know why North Korea makes decisions that they believe “do not make sense” — or that they would not make. I would argue that this is the wrong way to think about “rationality.” A rational actor simply forms clear, coherent goals; provides a prioritizing order to those goals (e.g., I want A more than I want B); and adopts the most beneficial path (or objectives) for it to achieve those goals. North Korea does each of these things. We may disagree with what it values (or wants) and how it goes about fulfilling these wants, but that alone does not make its behavior necessarily irrational. When we focus instead on what North Korea wants and how it prioritizes these wants — that is, when we try to understand it as a rational actor — we can then work with it to find potential non-violent paths to achieving its goals.

Filters close

Showing results

110 of 5609
Newswise: UA Little Rock researchers investigate information campaigns designed to influence 2019 Canadian election
Released: 30-Oct-2020 5:25 PM EDT
UA Little Rock researchers investigate information campaigns designed to influence 2019 Canadian election
University of Arkansas at Little Rock

A group of researchers from the University of Arkansas at Little Rock have published an article that examined the possible use of online media campaigns orchestrated to influence the 2019 Canadian federal election. The article, “The Role of YouTube during the 2019 Canadian Federal Election: A Multi-Method Analysis of Online Discourse and Information Actors,” was published in the Journal of Future Conflict in September.

Released: 30-Oct-2020 12:00 PM EDT
5 Big Questions on Health Care and COVID-19
University of Virginia Darden School of Business

The coronavirus pandemic has once again thrust the unusual state of American health care into the spotlight. With a presidential election that could have a dramatic impact on the state of health care for millions on 3 November, Professor Vivian Riefberg considers the state of the industry.

Newswise:Video Embedded newswise-expert-panels-on-covid-19-pandemic-notable-excerpts-quotes-and-videos-available
Released: 30-Oct-2020 8:25 AM EDT
Newswise Expert Panels on COVID-19 Pandemic: Notable excerpts, quotes and videos available

Newswise is hosting a series of Expert Panels discussion on unique aspects of the COVID-19 pandemic. This tip sheet includes some notable quotes from the panelists.

Released: 30-Oct-2020 8:20 AM EDT
Newswise Live Event for Nov 2nd, 2PM EDT: the 2020 Presidential Elections

Experts from institutions including George Washington University and Cornell University will participate in an expert panel covering a wide variety of topics on the U.S. Elections, with questions prepared by Newswise editors and submissions from media attendees.

Released: 29-Oct-2020 1:30 PM EDT
Facing up to the reality of politicians’ Instagram posts
University of Georgia

A University of Georgia researcher used computer vision to analyze thousands of images from over 100 Instagram accounts of United States politicians and discovered posts that showed politicians’ faces in nonpolitical settings increased audience engagement over traditional posts such as politicians in professional or political settings.

Newswise: 247321_web.jpg
Released: 29-Oct-2020 11:35 AM EDT
How Twitter takes votes away from Trump but not from Republicans

A popular narrative holds that social media network Twitter influenced the outcome of the 2016 presidential elections by helping Republican candidate Donald Trump spread partisan content and misinformation. In a recent interview with CBS News, Trump himself stated he "would not be here without social media."

Released: 29-Oct-2020 10:05 AM EDT
Rutgers Expert Explains QAnon
Rutgers University-New Brunswick

The author of Conspiracy Panics: Political Rationality and Popular Culture describes QAnon, why it’s well-known and why we should not treat this as a misinformation problem.

Showing results

110 of 5609