Buying Bad Recreation Causes More Grief

Newswise — The traditional belief is that, when people have disposable income to spend for pleasure, buying a recreational experience brings more happiness than acquiring tangible objects of equivalent price.

New research, however, reveals the matter to be more complex. Among the findings: A recreational experience gone wrong will cause much more unhappiness than the purchase of poor-quality goods.

“Happiness for Sale: Do Experiential Purchases Make Consumers Happier than Material Purchases?”, by Dr. Leonardo Nicolao of the M.J. Neeley School of Business at Texas Christian University in Fort Worth, Dr. Julie R. Irwin of the University of Texas, and Dr. Joseph K. Goodman of Washington University in St. Louis, appears in the August 2009 issue of the Journal of Consumer Research.

“If someone invests in a vacation instead of a new kitchen, and the vacation turns out great, they will be happier than if they had spent the same amount on an excellent kitchen,” explains Dr. Nicolao of TCU. “But if they had a horrible vacation, they will feel much worse than if they had bought a horrible kitchen.”

The study is the first to compare the after-effects of experiential and material purchases on the happiness levels of buyers, both when the purchases went well and when they did not. Only one previous study tested whether experiential versus material purchases make people happier. That one, however, focused solely on positive situations.

“In examining earlier research, we noticed that a strong link was assumed between experiential purchases and happiness,” says Dr. Nicolao, an assistant professor of marketing at TCU. “But this assumption had not been thoroughly tested.”

Dr. Nicolao and his co-authors found that, in general, the link holds true when consumers feel the purchases were positive. Negative outcomes, however, produce very different results. Dr. Nicolao believes the reason is that people adapt more slowly to experiences than to material acquisitions. It’s a process known as hedonic adaptation.

“Hedonic adaptation means that buyers get used to stimuli of a hedonic nature. For instance, when someone buys a car, they may be very happy initially, but soon they get used to driving it. Then it’s just a car,” he says. Similarly, when people are displeased with a purchase of consumer goods, they soon adapt to the situation.

By contrast, when people buy an experience, they revisit it in their memories long afterward, in a sense allowing them to enjoy the experience over and over — or to relive the agony, depending on how it went. Those memories keep the experience from quickly passing into the hum-drum.

The researchers conducted three experiments. The first tested how the positivity/negativity of experiential and material purchases affects happiness and rated participants’ levels of materialism. The second examined positive/negative memory associations based on purchase type. The third measured happiness with a small material or experiential purchase immediately after the transaction, then at seven minutes, one day, one week, and two weeks. Participants were several hundred university students.

Analysis revealed that experiential purchases elicited more emotion than did material purchases. They brought more happiness than material goods when outcomes were positive and greater unhappiness when outcomes were negative. This relationship was weaker for participants with high levels of materialism, for whom tangible goods carry greater importance as compared to people with low materialism, Dr. Nicolao says.

The study also confirmed that buyers adapt more slowly to experiential purchases than to material purchases, whether the experience was good or bad.

“Our findings suggest that a lifetime of negative experiential purchases might lead to quite an unhappy life, and furthermore that negative material purchases may not leave as much of a negative mark,” the study states.

“Often there’s no way to know beforehand whether the outcome of a purchase will be positive or negative. Our paper is intended as a caution. The idea has been widespread since the 1700s that people will be happier if they invest in experiences rather than things,” says Dr. Nicolao.

“We have shown that’s not always the case, and a major reason is that people adapt more slowly to experiences than to objects,” he says.