University of Notre Dame

Experts say most damaging scenario to US democracy is Trump rejecting election results, potential Supreme Court ruling against him

26-Oct-2020 8:55 AM EDT, by University of Notre Dame

To get expert opinions on the fate of the nearly 245-year-old democracy, a group of students from the University of Notre Dame’s Keough School of Global Affairs and Department of Political Science conducted a survey and a path selection game with 150 members of political science professional associations who specialize in elections, both in the U.S. and abroad. The results are published in the Keough School’s latest policy paper “American Democracy at Risk: A Comparative Perspective.”

The most damaging scenario to U.S. democracy, a situation the experts overwhelmingly expect (80 percent likelihood), is President Trump refusing to leave office if he loses — regardless of the context or margin of victory — and rejecting a Supreme Court ruling against him. The group also finds that demonstrations and potentially violent responses are somewhat likely in case of a Trump defeat, but predict a Biden loss would make them even more likely. In fact, the policy paper authors wrote that a recent study revealed “a meaningful minority of partisans are open to electoral violence, with about one in five voters stating that violence would be at least ‘a little’ justified if the other party were to win the election.” 

Before the results are even tallied, the experts point to other areas of great concern such as attempts at voter suppression, foreign interference and the removal of ballot drop boxes.

“During the pre-election phase, we found that respondents were most concerned about President Trump’s attacks on the media, the reduction of access to voting (including reduction in polling stations and the removal of voters from the voting rolls) and large-scale foreign and domestic disinformation campaigns,” the authors wrote.  

To mitigate these circumstances and protect the integrity of the voting process, the group recommends that election officials, community organizations, political parties, elected leaders, journalists and others conduct anti-disinformation campaigns; educate voters about their electoral rights and the logistics of voting in their local community; provide clear guidelines and instructions on how to vote correctly with mail-in ballots; and urge voters to vote early.

Regarding voting in person, the respondents underscored the importance of both official law enforcement and non-partisan volunteers being available to maintain peace and security at polling stations. However, some of the experts warned that an excessive police presence — especially in communities of color —could intimidate voters.

This election is not only taking place in the context of a contentious, divided environment, but one immersed in the chaos and uncertainty of a pandemic. Fear of contracting the virus among large crowds of people has prompted many voters to vote by mail, which could lead to delays in certifying the election results. The experts are concerned “about the damaging effects of a premature announcement of results, and the possible rejection of mail-in ballots.”

In the battleground states of Wisconsin and Pennsylvania, the law states that ballots cannot be processed before Election Day. With millions of ballots to be counted, one day is hardly sufficient.

“Experts in our study placed the heavy burden to mitigate misinformation on the media, guided by journalistic principles and ethics to refrain from reporting prematurely. Yet, many expect partisan-leaning media outlets will proceed to do so regardless,” said Maggie Shum, postdoctoral research associate at the Keough School of Global Affairs and one of the policy paper authors. “One expert highlighted the Canada Elections Act, designed to prevent the transmission of any election results until polls are closed nationwide, as a good example. However, the changing dynamic of journalism and technology make such a gag order hard to monitor. This is a broader challenge beyond this election to combat the spread of ‘fake news.’”

In the long term, experts suggest a number of actions that should be taken to reform and streamline the voting process in order to make it easier for Americans to vote. Sending out ballots early to voters is one suggestion they had to mitigate the risks of a backlog of ballots. To increase election credibility and transparency, some of the experts suggest inviting a neutral, nonpartisan group of international observers who monitor the entire process. This practice is common in both young and fragile democracies, and could be done through establishing tighter collaboration with foreign observers as well as with state and local actors.

It was determined that Russia interfered with the U.S. election in 2016. To prevent the same from happening in 2020 and beyond, the experts suggest federal and state policies to deal with digital threats. These policies should strengthen the capacity of national security and cybersecurity authorities and tighten restrictions on social media platforms to counter digital threats.

Despite the distressing issues covered in this project, the student group’s overall assessment of the prospects for American democracy remains hopeful.

“Our review of the comparative literature on electoral risks suggests that the U.S. should be strong enough to weather this crisis and emerge stronger as a result,” they wrote. “The country’s capability to decrease and overcome electoral risks will require institutional changes to address current vulnerabilities, and a long-term commitment to enhancing electoral access and security. Ultimately, the protection of our democracy is in the hands of the American electorate, who will judge the legitimacy of our election system and the actions of the candidates and have the power to decide accordingly.”

Filters close

Showing results

110 of 4219
Released: 4-Dec-2020 4:30 PM EST
New review confirms disproportionate impact of COVID-19 on Black, Hispanic populations
Oregon Health & Science University

Black and Hispanic populations are disproportionately affected by COVID-19, according to a systematic review published this week.

Newswise: 250647_web.jpg
Released: 4-Dec-2020 4:05 PM EST
For nationalistic regimes, similar COVID-19 policies are the sincerest form of flattery
University of Texas at Arlington

Analysis from a University of Texas at Arlington assistant professor of public policy suggests that nationalistic governments around the globe are more likely to copy other nationalistic governments in responding to the current pandemic.

Released: 4-Dec-2020 3:15 PM EST
New Study Finds Once Hospitalized, Black Patients with COVID-19 Have Lower Risk of Death than White Patients
NYU Langone Health

A team of investigators at NYU Langone Health has found that once hospitalized, Black patients (after controlling for other serious health conditions and neighborhood income) were less likely to have severe illness, die, or be discharged to hospice compared to White patients.

Released: 4-Dec-2020 2:35 PM EST
AANA Commends CDC on Prioritizing COVID-19 Vaccine Distribution to Healthcare Personnel
American Association of Nurse Anesthetists (AANA)

The American Association of Nurse Anesthetists (AANA) commends the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC's) team of advisors on prioritizing frontline healthcare personnel and residents of long-term facilities for the first phase of the COVID-19 vaccine distribution.

Released: 4-Dec-2020 1:50 PM EST
COVID-19 in Victorian schools and childcare mainly driven by community transmission
Murdoch Childrens Research Institute

Analysis of Victorian data by the Murdoch Children's Research Institute suggests that COVID-19 cases in schools and childcare were mainly driven by community transmission

Released: 4-Dec-2020 12:20 PM EST
Identifying markers of COVID-19 infection using blood tests
University of Seville

Researchers from the Institute of Biomedicine of Seville (IBIS) have presented a study carried out in the Clinical Biochemistry Service of the Virgen del Rocío University Hospital which identifies the values for six biochemical biomarkers that indicate a patient may be infected with SARS-COV-2 (COVID-19).

Released: 4-Dec-2020 12:05 PM EST
Research confirms crucial monitoring assessment is effective for patients with COVID-19
University of Portsmouth

A combined research team from the Universities of Portsmouth and Bournemouth and Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust has shown that an assessment score used to measure a patient's severity of illness can be applied to patients with Covid-19 without modification.

Newswise:Video Embedded flccc-alliance-calls-on-national-health-authorities-to-immediately-review-medical-evidence-showing-the-efficacy-of-ivermectin-for-the-prevention-of-covid-19-and-as-an-early-outpatient-treatment
Released: 4-Dec-2020 12:00 PM EST
FLCCC Alliance Calls on National Health Authorities to Immediately Review Medical Evidence Showing the Efficacy of Ivermectin for the Prevention of COVID-19 and as an Early Outpatient Treatment
Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC Alliance)

“Following the swi. review— and subsequent guidance— by the NIH and theCDC of Ivermectin, we expect that Ivermectin’s widespread, immediate use willallow for a rapid and safe re-opening of businesses and schools across the nation—and quickly reduce the strain on overwhelmed ICUs.” —FLCCC Alliance

Released: 4-Dec-2020 11:50 AM EST
Immunity passports: Ethical conflict and opportunity
University of the Basque Country

Immunity passports are a means of registering whether an individual has developed immunity to COVID-19 and is therefore unlikely to either catch or spread the disease.

Showing results

110 of 4219