Newswise — Vienna, Austria—1 November 2016—The International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) held its second plenary session, Differential Pricing of Medicines in Europe: Implications for Access, Innovation, and Affordability, this morning at the Society’s 19th Annual European Congress in Vienna, Austria.
The plenary was moderated Lou Garrison, PhD, Professor Emeritus, Pharmaceutical Outcomes Research and Policy Program, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA and ISPOR President (2016-2017). Speakers included:- Sabine Vogler, PhD, Program Coordinator, Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmaceutical Policy Analysis, Head of the World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Pharmaceutical Pricing and Reimbursement Policies, Gesundheit Österreich GmbH (GÖG/Austrian Public Health Institute), Vienna, Austria- Jo De Cock, Chief Executive Officer, National Institute of Health and Disability Insurance, Brussels, Belgium- Panos Kanavos, MSc, PhD, Associate Professor, International Health Policy, Department of Social Policy, London School of Economics (LSE) and Programme Director, Medical Technology Research Group at LSE Health- Adrian Towse, MA, MPhil, Director, Office of Health Economics, London, UK
This plenary session examined options for promoting efficient differential pricing in Europe, where the current European Union (EU) legal environment supports free movement of goods, thereby making it difficult to implement country-specific pricing.
Lou Garrison, PhD outlined the case for differential pricing for medicines across countries, which health economists have long maintained could improve global dynamic efficiency and promote optimal innovation. Professor Garrison argued that manufacturers would be willing to accept differential pricing as long as there is no parallel trade or “leakage” through external reference pricing. Garrison set the stage for the panel discussion by posing the question, “Given the current legal and political realities in Europe, what is the best way forward to achieve some form of differential pricing?”
Sabine Vogler, PhD began the discussion by defining differential pricing (also referred to as “tiered pricing”) as the strategy of selling the same product to different customers at different prices. She noted that it is important to distinguish between “willingness to pay” and “ability to pay.” For example, lower income countries have the “willingness to pay” for medicines, but cannot afford it because of their limited “ability to pay.” Dr. Vogler delineated prerequisites for differential pricing, including avoidance of leakage, appropriate price setting, transparency, avoidance of distortion through high markups and taxes, combination with other policies, sufficient capacity, and perhaps most importantly—political will.
Jo De Cock spoke about the how differential pricing could move from theory into action in Europe. De Cock defined differential pricing as applying different prices to different markets for the same products, taking into account differences in income level. He discussed elements that a win-win situation for differential pricing in Europe would need in order to succeed, including improved access for patients in response to real unmet needs, the expectation that the price is fair, the possibility of market expansion and rewards for innovation for manufacturers, and decisions that are based on more transparent data.
Panos Kanavos, MSc, PhD spoke on the key policy objectives for differential pricing and how those objectives might be achieved. Dr. Kanavos noted that differential pricing can be optimal as long as patients don’t have fewer therapeutic options. He suggested that cross-border collaborations could contribute to access and affordability, and that new value assessment frameworks are needed to support decision making.
Adrian Towse, MA, MPhil spoke about how differential pricing in Europe could move from theory into practice. He noted that Europe has a practical problem of inequitable access to medications across its 28 member states. Towse remarked that low per capita income markets in Europe suffer from shortages of supply, unaffordable prices, and marketing delays. He proposed two feasible solutions: one involves the establishment of a two-tier Europe with a block of lower per capita income countries; the second involves confidential discounts to the European member states. In sum, Towse noted that if current patient access issues could be addressed, the overall welfare of the European Union would increase, provided that returns to R&D were not reduced in the higher income countries.
Additional information on the ISPOR 19th Annual European Congress can be found here. Released presentations from the congress can be found here. Interested parties can follow news and developments from the conference on social media using the hashtag #ISPORVienna.
ABOUT ISPORThe International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) is a nonprofit, international, educational and scientific organization that promotes health economics and outcomes research excellence to improve decision making for health globally. Web: www.ISPOR.org | LinkedIn: www.bit.ly/ISPOR-IN | Twitter: www.bit.ly/ISPOR-T (@ISPORorg) | YouTube: www.bit.ly/ISPOR-YT |Facebook: www.bit.ly/ISPOR-FB