Expert Pitch
American Psychological Association (APA)

How Can Furloughed Feds Deal with the Stress of the Shutdown? APA Psychologist Offers Strategies

According to a survey the American Psychological Association released late last year, nearly two out of three Americans say they are significantly stressed by finances and the partial government shutdown is just making matters worse with no end in sight. That stress, and the lack of resources over time, can not only adversely affect people’s health, but lead otherwise rational people to make emotional, irrational decisions.

On Jan. 11, 2019, the APA issued a statement calling for an immediate end to the partial government shutdown because of the deleterious effect it is having on the economic security and mental health of federal employees and contractors, as well as their families.

While psychology may not be able to solve financial problems faced by furloughed workers, it can offer some helpful advice on how they can cope with the anxiety associated with the shutdown.  That, in turn, can help them feel less stressed and ultimately make more rational decisions about their finances. 

APA’s Director of Research and Special Projects Vaile Wright, PhD, who is also a licensed therapist, can discuss how financial stress affects decision making, as well as provide strategies to cope with it.

Some examples:

  • Maintain healthy routines – if your usual routine during the week includes going to the gym, cooking meals for your family and getting enough sleep, keep that up. Don’t abandon it because you are not reporting to work.
  • Stay active – volunteer in the community, tackle a new task around the house, take advantage of free or discounted opportunities being offered to furloughed employees (especially those in the DC area).
  • Don’t isolate – social support is an important buffer to stress and anxiety and, for many, the office is a primary source of social interaction. 

The APA also has online resources that furloughed feds may find useful:

Managing Your Stress in Tough Economic Times

The Great Unknown:10 Tips for Dealing with the Stress of Uncertainty

Face the Numbers: Moving Beyond Financial Denial

Filters close

Showing results

110 of 5507
Released: 29-Sep-2020 4:05 PM EDT
Experts ready to provide insight on 2020 elections
Florida State University

By: Mark Blackwell Thomas | Published: September 29, 2020 | 3:51 pm | SHARE: With the 2020 election cycle in full swing, American voters find themselves with no shortage of issues to consider when deciding which candidate has earned the right to help tackle them. Racial unrest, historic wildfires and a pandemic that’s infected millions and led to 200,000 American deaths are among the factors shaping an electorate that’s polarized like never before.

Newswise: mercedes-mehling-XmSdvDOuRZg-unsplash-scaled.jpg
Released: 29-Sep-2020 3:50 PM EDT
WashU Expert: Withholding federal funds from ‘anarchist jurisdictions’ violates Constitution
Washington University in St. Louis

The U.S. Department of Justice Sept. 21 issued a list of “anarchist jurisdictions,” pursuant to an order from President Donald Trump to review federal funding for cities where violence or vandalism has occurred adjacent to protests.If the Trump administration withholds federal funds from these jurisdictions based on the “anarchist” designation, that withholding of funds would violate the Constitution in at least two ways, says a Constitutional law expert at Washington University in St.

Released: 29-Sep-2020 12:25 PM EDT
Sensational COVID-19 communication erodes confidence in science
Cornell University

Scientists, policymakers and the media should acknowledge inherent uncertainties in epidemiological models projecting the spread of COVID-19 and avoid “catastrophizing” worst-case scenarios, according to new research from Cornell University.

Released: 29-Sep-2020 8:05 AM EDT
Study Identifies Shortcomings in FDA Evaluations for New Opioid Drug Approvals Over Two Decades
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health

Approvals of prescription opioids by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration over more than two decades have been based on evaluations in narrowly defined patient groups for which certain safety-related outcomes have been rarely systematically assessed, according to a new analysis from researchers at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.


Showing results

110 of 5507

close
1.53853