Green Is Cool, But U.S. Land Changes Generally Are Not

  • newswise-fullscreen Green Is Cool, But U.S. Land Changes Generally Are Not

    Credit: Credit: Souleymane Fall

    A map shows observation minus reanalysis (OMR) trends in the continental United States from 1979-2003. The trends are associated with land use and land use changes. Researchers from Purdue University and the universities of Colorado and Maryland conducted a study of the continental United States. Their results show that land use can affect surface temperatures locally and regionally. Units are in degrees Celsius per decade.

  • newswise-fullscreen Green Is Cool, But U.S. Land Changes Generally Are Not

    Credit: Photo by John Consoli, University of Maryland

    University of Maryland Professor of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science Eugenia Kalnay

Newswise — Most land-use changes occurring in the continental United States reduce vegetative cover and raise regional surface temperatures, says a new study by scientists at the University of Maryland, Purdue University, and the University of Colorado in Boulder.

The study, which will appear in the Royal Meteorological Society’s International Journal of Climatology, found that almost any change that makes land cover less "green" contributes to warming. However, a less intuitive finding is that conversion of any land to agricultural use results in cooling, even land that was previously forested.

Derived using a University of Maryland developed analytical approach known as OMR, the findings build on previous research and add significant weight to a growing recognition among climate scientists for the need to more fully incorporate land-use change into computer models that are designed to forecast future changes in climate conditions.

"We found that most land-use changes, especially urbanization, result in warming," said University of Maryland Professor Eugenia Kalnay, one of the study's co-authors. "A clear exception is conversion of land from other uses to agriculture, which produces relative cooling, presumably because of increased evaporation," said Kalnay, who developed the now widely used OMR (observation minus reanalysis) method with former Maryland colleague Ming Cai, now an associate professor at Florida State University.

"The study's results also confirm the robustness of the OMR method, particularly in providing an estimate of the impact of local and regional land cover changes on temperature trends," said Kalnay, a “Distinguished University Professor” in Maryland's department of atmospheric and oceanic science and a former director of the Environmental Modeling Center of the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (U.S. National Weather Service).

The study was led by Purdue University researchers Souleymane Fall and Dev Niyogi and brought together two pioneers in the study of temperature effects of land-use change, Maryland's Kalnay and Roger Pielke Sr. of the University of Colorado in Boulder. Pielke is widely recognized as the leader in understanding and accounting for the impact of regional land-use and land-use changes on climate change at regional and local levels. According to Kalnay she was inspired years ago to develop the OMR method by a "stimulating seminar given by Pielke."

More to Climate Change than CO2Until recently, human-induced changes (warming) in climate have been viewed by most scientists as primarily the result of increasing concentrations of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases. However, the current paper is the latest of a number of studies in recent years that are shedding light on the climate change impact of land cover change.

“What we highlight here is that a significant trend, particularly the warming trend in terms of temperatures, can also be partially explained by land-use change,” said Niyogi, a Purdue earth and atmospheric sciences professor and the Indiana state climatologist, who is the corresponding author of the article.

“People realize that land cover also is an important forcing and not only at local but at regional scale,” said Fall, whose doctoral research at Purdue focuses on the impacts of land surface properties on near surface temperature trends.

These finding don’t negate the effects of greenhouses gases like carbon dioxide, explained Kalnay, who this year was given the International Meteorological Organization (IMO) Prize, the World Meteorological Organization’s most prestigious award. “I think that greenhouse warming is incredibly important, but land use should not be neglected,” she said. “It clearly contributes to warming, especially in urban and arid areas.” Among the study’s specific findings: * In general, the more vegetation covering an area of land, the cooler its contribution to surface temperature. * Development of forests and farmlands and other local and regional changes in land use more often result in warming than cooling. * Urbanization and conversion to bare soils have the largest warming impacts * Conversion to agriculture results in cooling, while conversion from agriculture generally results in warming.* Deforestation generally results in warming, with the exception of a shift from forest to agriculture* the temperature effect of planting a new forest is still unclear. . In addition to Fall, Niyogi, Kalnay and Pielke, the study's coauthors include Alexander Gluhovsky and Gilbert Rochonf of Purdue. Their work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy Atmospheric Radiation Measurement program, NASA, the National Science Foundation and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. The study will appear in print later this year. An online version is at:

  • share-facebook-Green Is Cool, But U.S. Land Changes Generally Are Not
  • share-twitter-Green Is Cool, But U.S. Land Changes Generally Are Not


Chat now!