American Concrete Institute ACI Structural Journal November/December 2017

Stability of Slender Wall Boundaries Subjected to Earthquake Loading

by Pablo F. Parra and Jack P. Moehle

Newswise — Structural walls have proved to be an effective system for protecting buildings from strong earthquakes, and their design and use over the past decades has evolved into thinner and heavily stressed cross sections. Presented are the main results of a theoretical and numerical analyses conducted on axially loaded prismatic members to evaluate the onset of global instability under tension/compression load cycles. A buckling theory suitable for hand calculations is introduced and evaluated using data available from tests conducted on columns. Computer simulations are used to numerically simulate the tests and study the influence of nonuniform strain profiles along the height of the member in the onset of out-of-plane buckling.

Out-of-plane buckling

Out-of-plane buckling of slender reinforced concrete walls occurs when the concrete section buckles out-of-plane over a portion of the wall length and height. The slenderer flexural compression zones can be susceptible to out-of-plane buckling during strong earthquakes, as shown in Figure 1. Design practices prior to the 1990s favored rectangular walls with enlarged boundary elements, contributing to the stability of the flexural compression zone. Also, prior to 2010, the out-of-plane buckling of structural walls during cyclic lateral loading had been reported in laboratory tests, but never from an actual earthquake.

More recently, however, after two earthquakes of significant magnitude––one in Chile (2010) and the other in New Zealand (2011)––prevailing practices in many countries changed to favor rectangular sections without enlarged boundaries. Following the Mw 8.8 Maule Earthquake in central Chile in 2010, out-of-plane buckling of slender walls was reported in two buildings (Figure 1). Damage associated with out-of-plane deformation of structural wall boundaries was also observed following the Mw 6.3 New Zealand Earthquake in 2011. These observations created a renewed interest and research in the practical aspects of inelastic buckling of slender structural walls.

Analytical studies

In the past, researchers proposed theoretical models for buckling of prismatic columns under uniform tension/compression cycles, where the key parameter is the maximum tensile strain prior buckling during load reversal. These models have shown good accuracy in comparison with experimental and analytical studies conducted on cyclically loaded columns under constant axial force.

Analysis of slender walls, however, requires the consideration of other aspects that influence the response. Because walls have strain gradients along their length and height, both effects must be considered for a more accurate estimation of the onset of out-of-plane instability. Although in some cases, the assumption of uniform axial strain along the wall height is reasonable, in the more general case this assumption leads to an underestimation of the maximum tensile strain required to buckle the wall during load reversal.  This results in an overestimation of the minimum wall thickness required for design to prevent buckling from occurring.

Results of the analyses conducted on the members to evaluate the onset of global instability under tension/compression load showed that the onset of buckling can be identified using either the proposed buckling theory or computer simulations. Furthermore, buckling is affected by gradients of axial load or strain along the length of the member. Design recommendations are made to inhibit global wall buckling during strong earthquakes.

The research can be found in a paper titled “Stability of Slender Wall Boundaries Subjected to Earthquake Loading,” published by ACI Structural Journal.

###

For more information, contact:

Julie Webb

Marketing & Communications Coordinator

248-848-3148

[email protected]

 

Always Advancing – The American Concrete Institute is a leading authority and resource worldwide for the development and distribution of consensus-based standards and technical resources, educational programs and certifications for individuals and organizations involved in concrete design, construction and materials, who share a commitment to pursuing the best use of concrete. ACI’s inclusive, individual member-driven structure and valuable, cost-effective benefits result in an essential organization that invites partnerships and welcomes all concrete professionals who wish to be a part of a respected, connected social group that provides an opportunity for professional growth, networking and enjoyment. For additional information, visit www.concrete.org

 

SEE ORIGINAL STUDY