Breaking News:

U.S. Supreme Court

Add to Favorites | Subscribe | Share

Filters:

  • (Press "esc" to clear)

Medicine

Science

Life

Business

Law and Public Policy

Channels:

Presidential Debate: Expert Panel Gives Scientific Analysis of Candidates' Performances

Four expert panelists each day will present their analyses and answer your questions live and face-to-face. This event will be virtual. You can attend with any device -- PC, Mac, iPad, iPhone or Android device (with a webcam) – anywhere with good bandwidth. To participate (ask questions) in the meeting, you must be on video, just as a normal news conference. Register below for guaranteed seating; there is limited seating in the virtual room. Eight experts (four at each event) will present their analyses. The diverse expert team (7 universities and an institute) will analyze both candidates during the debates for their gestures, facial expressions (including smiles--number, type, appropriateness, etc.), posture, language, including sentiment, tone, inflammatory language, repetition, vocabulary, sentence structure, metaphors, framing, themes, suggestions, subtlety, nuance, honesty (deceit/lies—explicit and implicit), transparency, gender issues, and more...

Life

Law and Public Policy

Channels:

U.S. Supreme Court, U.S. Supreme Court Decisions, Scotus, Gavin Grimm, transgender access to bathrooms, transgender legal protection

Legal Expert Available to Comment on Supreme Court’s Decision to Block Student’s Use of Boys’ Bathroom

RS37872_Weatherby2.jpg

Business

Channels:

Jonathan Adler, Case Western Reserve University School of Law, Supreme Court of the United States, Chief Justive, John Roberts, Business Law

New Book: Is the Roberts Court Pro-Business? Not Necessarily

Adler.jpg

At first glance, the new book Business and the Roberts Court (Oxford University Press) is a valuable read for lawyers practicing business law, and for the academics who teach it. Digging deeper, it’s a captivating mystery.Is the Roberts Court pro-business or not? Business and the Roberts Court provides clues about how the nation’s high court may respond to business cases put before it in the years ahead.

Life

Law and Public Policy

Channels:

Supreme Court, Abortion, Scotus, abortion rights, Texas

WashU Expert: SCOTUS Decision Big Win for Access to Reproductive Health Care

The Supreme Court ruled June 27 to throw out a Texas law making access to abortion more difficult in the state.The move is an important win for women and their access to reproductive health care, said Susan Appleton, the Lemma Barkeloo & Phoebe Couzins Professor of Law at Washington University in St. Louis and a noted expert on family law and reproductive rights.

Medicine

Channels:

Supreme Court Abortion, Public Health, abortion law, access to abortion

Supreme Court Strikes Down Anti-Abortion Provisions in Texas Case: GW Experts Available

Life

Law and Public Policy

Channels:

Immigration Policy, Immigration, Immigration Expert, Supreme Court

Expert Says Supreme Court Immigration Decision Places Millions of Lives in Limbo

dlbrown.jpg

Life

Law and Public Policy

Channels:

Supreme Court, Virginia, Politics

Supreme Court Decision on Former Gov. Bob McDonnell Confirms Overreach by Federal Government, Says Virginia Tech Political Expert

Life

Law and Public Policy

Channels:

U.S. Supreme Court, U.S. Supreme Court Decisions, Scotus, Affirmative Action, Fisher v. Texas

Affirmative Action Legal Expert Available to Comment on Fisher v. UT

RS54344_9097_16_AnnKillenbeck-2-Edit.jpg

Life

Law and Public Policy

Channels:

Public Opinion, Supreme Court Decisions

Texas A&M University Supreme Court Expert Available to Comment on Recent Decisions, Tie Vote

Life

Law and Public Policy

Channels:

Obama's deferred action program, Immigrants, Undocumented Immigrants

UCI Experts Available for Interviews About Deadlock on President Obama’s Deferred Action Program, Which Could Affect Up to 5 Million Undocumented Immigrants

Life

Law and Public Policy

Channels:

Chancellor McRaven's Response to Supreme Court Decision on Fisher Case

This morning, the United States Supreme Court ruled in our favor in the case of Fisher v. The University of Texas at Austin, affirming the university's right to continue using race and ethnicity as one factor in our holistic admissions process.

Life

Law and Public Policy

Channels:

Supreme Court, Supreme Court of the United States, Fisher v. University of Texas - Austin, Affirmative Action, Abigail Fisher, University Of Texas At Austin, College Admissions, Racial Discrimination

Supreme Court Ruling on Affirmative Action Case Isn’t the Clear Victory Some Might Think, Legal Scholar Says

TanyaWashington2015-300x300.png

Life

Law and Public Policy

Channels:

For your Supreme Court stories, please consider constitutional law professors Jonathan Adler, B. Jessie Hill and Jonathan Entin at Case Western Reserve University School of Law

Life

Law and Public Policy

Channels:

Supreme Court

SCOTUS Decisions on Affirmative Action, Immigration: U-M Experts Can Comment

Life

Law and Public Policy

Channels:

Supreme Court, Supreme Court of the United States, Immigration, DACA, DAPA, Deferred Action for Parental Accountability, Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, U.S. v. Texas, Undocumented Immigrants, President Obama

U.S. v. Texas Does Not Close Door to Future Policies That May Expand or Constrict Immigration Relief, Experts Say

Life

Education

Channels:

Affirmative Action, Diversity, U.S. Supreme Court, Higher Education, College Admissions, Race, University Of Texas At Austin, Fisher v. University of Texas, Education

ASA Applauds Supreme Court’s Ruling to Uphold Affirmative Action Program at University of Texas

The American Sociological Association (ASA) applauds the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling today in the affirmative action case Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin. The judgement allows the university to continue using race as a factor in admissions decisions.

Life

Law and Public Policy

Channels:

Supreme Court, Scotus, Immigration, Law

WashU Expert: SCOTUS Decision in United States v. Texas ‘Deeply Regrettable’

By a 4-4 vote, a short-handed U.S. Supreme Court today let stand a lower court’s 2-1 decision to block President Barack Obama’s executive actions on immigration. The decision is “deeply regrettable,” said a noted expert on immigration law at Washington University in St. Louis.The effect of the Supreme Court’s split decision is to affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

Life

Law and Public Policy

Channels:

Supreme Court, Immigration, Obama, Obama Administration

Supreme Court Expert Available to Comment on the President's Controversial Executive Actions on Immigration

SegalJeffery_1.jpg

Life

Law and Public Policy

Channels:

Affirmative Action, Supreme Court

Supreme Court Expert Reacts to Court Ruling of Affirmation Action Program

SegalJeffery.jpg

Life

Law and Public Policy

Channels:

Utah v. Strieff, search and seizure, Civil Rights, Civil Liberties, traffic stops, arrest warrants, U.S. Constitution, Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hands ‘Free Pass’ to Police in Otherwise Unconstitutional Traffic Stops, Expert Says

Nirej.Sekhon-300x300.jpg







Chat now!