Resisted and Assisted Sprint Training Both Increase Sprint Speed
Source Newsroom: Wolters Kluwer Health: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins
But Assisted Sprint Training Is Best for Increasing 'First-Step' Quickness, Reports JSCR
Newswise — Philadelphia, Pa. (September 22, 2011) - Two specialized training techniques—resisted and assisted sprint training—both lead to faster sprint speeds in high-level female soccer players, reports a study in the October issue of The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, official research journal of the National Strength and Conditioning Association (NSCA). The journal is published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, a part of Wolters Kluwer Health
However, the effects differ depending on acceleration distance, suggesting that the choice of speed enhancement techniques should be sport-specific. For sports like soccer that require "first-step" quickness, assisted sprint training is more likely to produce the desired result, according to the report by David E. Upton, Ph.D., of Texas Christian University, Fort Worth.
Differing Effects of Running 'With Assistance' versus 'Against Resistance'
Dr. Upton compared the effects of different sprint training programs in 27 NCAA Division IA female soccer players. After initial testing of 40-yard sprint speed, the women were randomly assigned to three different sprint training groups. One group received resisted sprint training, in which they ran against resistance. Another group received assisted sprint training, in which they ran with assistance.
The resisted and assisted drills were performed using specially designed harnesses, which allowed trainers to either pull against or pull with the athletes as they ran. The effect is comparable to running uphill (resisted training) or downhill (assisted training). Both techniques have been reported to improve sprint speeds, although the effects on performance have been inconclusive.
A third group received traditional sprint training, with no resistance or assistance. All training programs lasted for four weeks (twelve sessions).
Both resisted and assisted spring training led to significant increases in sprint speed. Overall 40-yard speed increased by 0.08 meters per second per meter with assisted training and 0.06 meters per second per meter with resisted training. For athletes receiving traditional sprint training, speed was unchanged.
Although the assisted and resisted training methods produced similar improvements in 40-yard sprint speed, the split times showed some significant differences. The assisted training group had significant increases in speed from 5 to 15 yards, compared to no change in this distance in the resisted training group.
In contrast, the resisted training group had increased speed from 25 to 40 yards, compared to no change in the assisted training group. The assisted training group had increased acceleration during the first 15 yards of the 40-yard sprint, while the resisted training group had increased acceleration during the final 25 yards.
"That is, the training modalities impact maximal velocity differentially as a result of their net effect on the rate of change in velocity, or acceleration, over the total distance covered," Dr. Upton explains. The improvement in initial quickness with assisted training may reflect "enhanced neuromuscular facilitation" in response to training at faster-than-normal (supramaximal) speeds.
From a practical standpoint, the choice of resisted versus assisted training may depend on the requirements of the individual sport. In soccer, initial acceleration is an important key to separating from or closing on an opposing player.
Thus assisted sprint training may be an effective way of developing "first-step quickness" in soccer players, whereas resisted training would be a good choice for a football wide receiver who needs to turn on the speed when running downfield. "Strength and conditioning professionals might consider using a combination of protocols, perhaps switching off between different days," Dr. Upton adds. "The key is to recognize the benefits of each technique and to use them in achieving sport-specific training goals."
About The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
The editorial mission of The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (JSCR) is to advance the knowledge about strength and conditioning through research. A unique aspect of this journal is that it includes recommendations for the practical use of research findings. While the journal name identifies strength and conditioning as separate entities, strength is considered a part of conditioning. The journal wishes to promote the publication of peer-reviewed manuscripts which add to our understanding of conditioning and sport through applied exercise science. The JSCR is the official research journal of the National Strength and Conditioning Association.
About the National Strength and Conditioning Association
The National Strength and Conditioning Association (NSCA) is an international nonprofit educational association founded in 1978. The NSCA develops and presents the most advanced information regarding strength training and conditioning practices and injury prevention. Central to its mission, the NSCA bridges the gap between the scientist in the laboratory and the practitioner in the field. By working to find practical applications for new research findings in the strength and conditioning field, the Association fosters the development of strength training and conditioning as a discipline and as a profession.
About Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins (LWW) is a leading international publisher for healthcare professionals and students with nearly 300 periodicals and 1,500 books in more than 100 disciplines publishing under the LWW brand, as well as content-based sites and online corporate and customer services.
LWW is part of Wolters Kluwer Health, a leading global provider of information, business intelligence and point-of-care solutions for the healthcare industry. Wolters Kluwer Health is part of Wolters Kluwer, a market-leading global information services company with 2010 annual revenues of €3.6 billion ($4.7 billion).