Two Proteins Compete for One Docking Station on a Growth Factor; One Promotes Metastasis, the Other Blocks It
Rivals’ relative expression levels in cancer cells could be biomarkers for prognosis, treatment
Article ID: 612738
Released: 23-Jan-2014 9:50 AM EST
Source Newsroom: University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center
Newswise — HOUSTON – Consider two drivers, each with a key that fits the same car. Driver 1 wants simply to turn on the ignition and leave the vehicle idling, ready and waiting to roll. Driver 2 wants to take it on a destructive joy ride.
Such is the case with two proteins identified by scientists at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center that fit on to the same binding site on an important cellular growth factor receptor called FGFR2 with starkly different results.
“There is competition for binding to FGFR2 and one of the two competitors, phospholipase Cγ1 (Plcγ1), will increase cancer cell metastasis. The other protein inhibits the opportunity for this to occur,” said John Ladbury, Ph.D., professor of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Ladbury is senior author of a paper published Sunday online at Nature Structural & Molecular Biology that describes the competition, identifies Plγcl’s role and its relationship to the metastasis-blocking growth factor receptor bound protein 2 (Grb2).
In a 2012 paper in the journal Cell, Ladbury and colleagues showed that Grb2 binds to FGFR2 and holds it in check, ready to be activated by a growth factor to signal other proteins. In performing this role, Grb2 blocks the binding of other proteins such as Plcγ1.
More Grb2, less Plcγ1 stymies metastasis
These interactions occur outside normal activation of FGFR2 by growth factors, so the protein with the highest concentration levels in the cell wins the contest to bind to FGFR, or fibroblast growth factor receptor 2, Ladbury said. “In cells with depleted Grb2 concentration, Plcγ1gets on the receptor, increasing cellular motility – equipping cells to move, escape the tumor, invade other tissue and spread.”
Quantifying the relative concentration of these two proteins in a patient’s tumor, Ladbury said, might be developed into reliable markers for gauging the likelihood that the cancer will spread and guide treatment decisions.
For example, an analysis of an ovarian cancer patient’s initial presentation could indicate early whether chemotherapy will be needed in addition to surgery to combat metastasis. Ovarian cancer patients with low Grb2 expression levels could have an increased risk that their cancer will spread.
Trade-off matters in at least 5 cancer types
Analysis of published data on 20 cancer cell lines including lung, ovarian, kidney, breast and colon cancers, showed that a cancer’s metastatic potential is linked to the relative concentration of Plcγ1 and Grb2 expression. Overexpression of Plcγ1 and low expression of Grb2 resulted in a high likelihood of metastasis, while high Grb2 and low Plcγ1 indicated a low likelihood that the cancer will spread.
Ladbury and colleagues set out to explain this relationship and its apparent effect with a series of cell line experiments that showed:
•Grb2 blocks the binding of Plcγ1 to FGFR2.
•Both proteins connect with the same site on FGFR2, using a similar domain on each protein to connect to the growth factor receptor.
•Binding to FGFR2 activates Plcγ1.
•Overexpression of Plcγ1 leads to increased invasion of other tissues, a vital step in metastasis.
All of this action occurs in the cell’s stable state, or homeostasis, before a growth factor stimulates FGFR2 into action, which is what made the team’s 2012 finding so striking. The domain (SH3) that each protein uses to connect to FGFR2 is not used in normal signaling.
FGFR2 spans a cell’s outer membrane, with its outer portion receiving growth factors and its inner region passing along activating signals that order other proteins to perform their functions. In this case, there’s no active signaling in the usual sense, Ladbury said.
Crucial events occur in background activity of cells
“That a protein can find a receptor using its SH3 domain is an entirely new idea,” Ladbury said. “There’s a lot of background activity in cells, just to keep them ticking over and in the past we’ve kind of ignored what’s happening there. Now we’ve shown that if these background activities are perturbed, they can lead to cancer.”
The Ladbury group is pursuing these studies to quantify the respective amounts of Grb2, Plcγ1 and FGFR2 in cancer cell lines to assess what levels might be prognostic. In addition they are investigating other receptors for their potential to bind SH3-domain containing proteins to build up a bigger picture of what pathways are involved in maintaining the stable state in cells.
Co-authors with Ladbury and first author Zahra Timsah, a graduate student in The University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, a joint program of MD Anderson and The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth), are Zamal Ahmed, Ph.D., Chi-Chuan Lin, Ph.D., Fernando Melo, Ph.D., Loren Stagg, Ph.D., Paul Leonard, Ph.D, and Prince Jeyabal, Ph.D., all in the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology; Jonathan Berrout, Ph.D., and Roger O’Neil, Ph.D., in the Department of Integrative Biology and Pharmacology at UTHealth, and Mikhail Bogdanov, Ph.D., of the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology at UTHealth.
This research was funded by the G. Harold and Leila Y. Mathers Charitable Foundation and a grant from the U.S. National Institutes of Health (DK070950).