Bone Drugs May Not Protect Osteoporotic Women From Breast Cancer

New Analysis of Clinical Trial Data by UCSF-Led Team Suggests Earlier Evidence Was Misleading

Released: 7-Aug-2014 7:00 AM EDT
Embargo expired: 11-Aug-2014 4:00 PM EDT
Source Newsroom: University of California, San Francisco (UCSF)
Contact Information

Available for logged-in reporters only

Citations JAMA Internal Medicine

Newswise — Osteoporosis drugs known as bisphosphonates may not protect women from breast cancer as had been thought, according to a new study led by researchers at UC San Francisco (UCSF).

The drugs’ protective effect was widely assumed after several observational studies showed that women who took them were less likely to get breast cancer.

But when researchers assessed the effect of two of the most widely used osteoporosis drugs – sold under the brand names, Fosamax and Reclast – in two large randomized clinical trials, neither drug protected women with osteoporosis from getting breast cancer. The results were published August 11, 2014, in JAMA Internal Medicine.

The researchers said the link found in the previous observational studies between taking the drugs and having a lower incidence of breast cancer may be due to a third factor, low estrogen.

Since having low estrogen both weakens bones and protects against most breast cancers, the women most likely to be prescribed drugs for osteoporosis are usually also at lower risk for breast cancer.

“They may have seen a lower risk of breast cancer in women using bisphosphonates in the earlier observational studies because those women had a lower risk of breast cancer to begin with,” said Trisha Hue, PhD, lead author of the study.

“Post-menopausal women with osteoporosis usually have low estrogen levels,” said Hue, an epidemiologist with the San Francisco Coordinating Center, a partnership between the CPMC Research Institute and the UCSF Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics. “Lower levels of estrogen are strongly associated with a lower risk of breast cancer.”

Steven Cummings, MD, a co-author of the paper, a UCSF emeritus professor of medicine and director of the San Francisco Coordinating Center, said women should not take these drugs thinking they will protect them from breast cancer.

“Post-menopausal women should continue taking these drugs for the prevention of fractures, but they should not use bisphosphonates for the prevention of primary breast cancer,” said Cummings, also a senior scientist at the CPMC Research Institute.

The data analyzed in the study came from two double blind, placebo controlled clinical trials. In both trials, women who received bisphosphonates had a slightly higher but statistically non-significant incidence of breast cancer.

The Fracture Intervention Trial (FIT) randomly assigned 6,459 women from the United States aged 55 to 81 to alendronate or a placebo for an average follow up of 3.8 years; 1.8 percent of the women who received the drug developed breast cancer, while 1.5 percent of those given a placebo developed the disease.

The Health Outcomes and Reduced Incidence with Zoledronic Acid Once Yearly-Pivotal Fracture Trial (HORIZON-PFT) randomly assigned 7,765 women from the United States, Canada, Asia, Europe and South America aged 65 to 89 to annual intravenous zoledronic acid or a placebo for an average follow up of 2.8 years; .87 percent of women who received the drug developed breast cancer, while .77 percent of those given a placebo developed the disease.

Women in either study who had recurrent breast cancer or reported a history of breast cancer were excluded from the analysis.

Other authors include Jane Cauley, DrPH, of the University of Pittsburgh; Douglas Bauer, MD, of UCSF; Kristine Ensrud, MD, of the University of Minnesota; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor, MD, of UC San Diego; and Dennis Black, PhD, of UCSF.

FIT was supported by Merck & Co., USA. HORIZON-PFT was supported by Novartis Pharma in Basel, Switzerland. Neither company was involved in the analysis or interpretation of the data for the manuscript or the decision to submit it for publication. The analysis was designed and conducted by non-Merck/non-Novartis investigators without additional financial support.

UCSF is the nation’s leading university exclusively focused on health. Now celebrating the 150th anniversary of its founding as a medical college, UCSF is dedicated to transforming health worldwide through advanced biomedical research, graduate-level education in the life sciences and health professions, and excellence in patient care. It includes top-ranked graduate schools of dentistry, medicine, nursing and pharmacy; a graduate division with world-renowned programs in the biological sciences, a preeminent biomedical research enterprise and two top-tier hospitals, UCSF Medical Center and UCSF Benioff Children’s Hospital San Francisco. Please visit www.ucsf.edu.


Comment/Share